AFX.DE vs. PDI

In the year-to-date period, AFX.DE achieves a 33.47% return, which is significantly higher than PDI's 8.14% return. Over the past 10 years, AFX.DE has outperformed PDI with an annualized return of 11.18%, while PDI has yielded a comparatively lower 8.03% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carl Zeiss Meditec AG (AFX.DE) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AFX.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the PDI Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFX.DE and PDI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AFX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than PDI's 13.98% yield.

The maximum AFX.DE drawdown since its inception was -91.83%, which is greater than PDI's maximum drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFX.DE and PDI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Carl Zeiss Meditec AG (AFX.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.30% compared to PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) at 9.17%. This indicates that AFX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carl Zeiss Meditec AG and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.