AFTY vs. KWEB
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB).
AFTY and KWEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AFTY is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the FTSE China A 50. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. Both AFTY and KWEB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AFTY or KWEB.
Key characteristics
| AFTY | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.63% | -5.56% |
| 1Y Return | -6.31% | -10.25% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -10.32% | -19.23% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -2.10% | -8.52% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.34 | -0.41 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.86% | 31.06% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.06% | -80.92% |
| Current Drawdown | -45.98% | -73.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFTY and KWEB is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AFTY vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AFTY achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -5.56% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFTY vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AFTY vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AFTY vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
AFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than KWEB's 1.81% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 2.17% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 8.63% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 1.81% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% | 0.89% | 0.31% |
Drawdowns
AFTY vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFTY drawdown since its inception was -51.06%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFTY and KWEB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AFTY vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) is 4.14%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 9.18%. This indicates that AFTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.