AFTY vs. KWEB
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB).
AFTY and KWEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AFTY is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the FTSE China A 50. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. Both AFTY and KWEB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AFTY or KWEB.
Correlation
The correlation between AFTY and KWEB is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AFTY vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
AFTY
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
KWEB
14.16%
18.03%
0.66%
16.76%
-5.42%
-0.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFTY vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AFTY vs. KWEB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AFTY
KWEB
AFTY vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AFTY vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 100.00% | 100.00% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 8.63% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% | 0.00% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 3.07% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
AFTY vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
AFTY vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) is 0.00%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 10.01%. This indicates that AFTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.