PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFTY vs. KWEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFTY vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AFTY

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KWEB

1D
-3.92%
1M
-4.79%
YTD
-20.06%
6M
-22.24%
1Y
-12.78%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
-14.28%
10Y*
0.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFTY vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%20.48%-12.80%-22.47%-7.37%33.77%44.23%-24.26%45.15%
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
-20.06%23.55%12.01%-9.06%-17.24%-49.01%58.23%29.92%-33.80%69.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AFTY and KWEB is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015

0.54

The correlation between AFTY and KWEB shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.54 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AFTY vs. KWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AFTY
KWEB

Financial Services

50.4%
2.2%

Basic Materials

15.5%

-

Energy

11.5%

-

Technology

7.4%
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
3.1%

Industrials

4.7%
3.1%

Utilities

4.4%

-

Communication Services

-

24.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

37.7%

Healthcare

-

6.0%

Real Estate

-

5.2%

Financial Services

AFTY
50.4%
KWEB
2.2%

Basic Materials

AFTY
15.5%
KWEB

-

Energy

AFTY
11.5%
KWEB

-

Technology

AFTY
7.4%
KWEB
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

AFTY
6.1%
KWEB
3.1%

Industrials

AFTY
4.7%
KWEB
3.1%

Utilities

AFTY
4.4%
KWEB

-

Communication Services

AFTY

-

KWEB
24.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AFTY

-

KWEB
37.7%

Healthcare

AFTY

-

KWEB
6.0%

Real Estate

AFTY

-

KWEB
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFTY vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFTY

KWEB
KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFTY vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFTY vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFTYKWEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

Drawdowns

AFTY vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFTYKWEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.85%

Volatility

AFTY vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFTYKWEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.99%

AFTY vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFTY vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.23%2.08%1.84%1.48%7.96%1.85%6.62%1.19%16.76%
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
7.70%6.16%3.51%1.71%0.00%7.07%0.29%0.08%3.40%0.58%1.19%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFTY and KWEB have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFTY is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFTY is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for KWEB.

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.70%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.

AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.76% for KWEB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFTY and KWEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer