AFMFX vs. BNB-USD
AFMFX (American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3) is Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by American Funds, while BNB-USD (BNB) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 5 years, AFMFX returned 10.80%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for BNB-USD. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AFMFX vs. BNB-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFMFX achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly higher than BNB-USD's -34.16% return.
AFMFX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 1Y
- 16.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.80%
- 10Y*
- —
BNB-USD
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -6.63%
- 6M
- -37.15%
- YTD
- -34.16%
- 1Y
- -17.84%
- 3Y*
- 31.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
AFMFX vs. BNB-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFMFX American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 | 9.84% | 16.43% | 15.30% | 9.77% | -4.19% | 23.64% | 5.04% | 21.90% | -1.98% | 3.36% |
BNB-USD BNB | -34.16% | 23.21% | 124.36% | 26.83% | -51.86% | 1,277.47% | 170.06% | 126.63% | -29.71% | 320.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFMFX and BNB-USD is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFMFX vs. BNB-USD — Risk / Return Rank
AFMFX
BNB-USD
AFMFX vs. BNB-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) and BNB (BNB-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFMFX | BNB-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.99 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | -0.31 | +2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | -0.46 | +8.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFMFX vs. BNB-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFMFX drawdown since its inception was -29.79%, smaller than the maximum BNB-USD drawdown of -79.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMFX and BNB-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFMFX | BNB-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.79% | -79.74% | +49.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -58.25% | +50.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.91% | -58.25% | +45.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.16% | -69.89% | +54.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -56.51% | +56.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.89% | -38.87% | +35.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 31.01% | -29.04% |
Volatility
AFMFX vs. BNB-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) is 2.53%, while BNB (BNB-USD) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that AFMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNB-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFMFX | BNB-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 8.57% | -6.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.42% | 34.71% | -27.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.66% | 44.56% | -34.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 49.24% | -36.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 79.72% | -65.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFMFX and BNB-USD have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNB-USD has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to AFMFX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFMFX dropped -29.79% vs BNB-USD's -79.74%.
AFMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFMFX and BNB-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer