AFL.DE vs. FDS
Compare and contrast key facts about Aflac Incorporated (AFL.DE) and FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AFL.DE or FDS.
Correlation
The correlation between AFL.DE and FDS is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AFL.DE vs. FDS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AFL.DE:
2.63
FDS:
-0.02
AFL.DE:
3.39
FDS:
0.12
AFL.DE:
1.53
FDS:
1.02
AFL.DE:
4.66
FDS:
-0.02
AFL.DE:
13.97
FDS:
-0.04
AFL.DE:
3.51%
FDS:
9.92%
AFL.DE:
18.61%
FDS:
21.20%
AFL.DE:
-45.98%
FDS:
-58.96%
AFL.DE:
-4.59%
FDS:
-5.02%
Fundamentals
AFL.DE:
€58.11B
FDS:
$18.04B
AFL.DE:
€6.46
FDS:
$13.97
AFL.DE:
16.19
FDS:
33.96
AFL.DE:
€13.63B
FDS:
$2.23B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFL.DE achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly higher than FDS's -2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, AFL.DE has underperformed FDS with an annualized return of 12.68%, while FDS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.
AFL.DE
5.47%
3.59%
18.64%
49.46%
26.89%
12.68%
FDS
-2.18%
-1.11%
17.46%
-2.58%
11.17%
13.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AFL.DE vs. FDS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AFL.DE
FDS
AFL.DE vs. FDS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL.DE) and FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AFL.DE vs. FDS - Dividend Comparison
AFL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than FDS's 0.87% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFL.DE Aflac Incorporated | 1.78% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 2.25% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc. | 0.87% | 0.85% | 0.80% | 0.87% | 0.66% | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.24% | 1.13% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.08% |
Drawdowns
AFL.DE vs. FDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFL.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.98%, smaller than the maximum FDS drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL.DE and FDS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AFL.DE vs. FDS - Volatility Comparison
Aflac Incorporated (AFL.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) at 4.51%. This indicates that AFL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AFL.DE vs. FDS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aflac Incorporated and FactSet Research Systems Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities