AFL.DE vs. AZO

In the year-to-date period, AFL.DE achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly lower than AZO's 8.03% return. Over the past 10 years, AFL.DE has underperformed AZO with an annualized return of 12.71%, while AZO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.98% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL.DE) and AutoZone, Inc. (AZO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AFL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the AZO Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFL.DE and AZO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AFL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, while AZO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum AFL.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.98%, roughly equal to the maximum AZO drawdown of -46.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL.DE and AZO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Aflac Incorporated (AFL.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) at 5.30%. This indicates that AFL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AZO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aflac Incorporated and AutoZone, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.