AFK vs. QQQ
AFK (VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFK is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AFK returned 5.75%/yr vs 21.97%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFK charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
AFK vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFK achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return. Over the past 10 years, AFK has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 5.75%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.97% annualized return.
AFK
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 44.31%
- 3Y*
- 23.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 5.75%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
AFK vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | 3.48% | 74.71% | 12.10% | -12.11% | -17.31% | 3.00% | 4.26% | 9.90% | -19.55% | 28.22% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.62% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFK and QQQ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2008 | 0.50 |
AFK vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFK
QQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
-
Financial Services
AFK
QQQ
Basic Materials
AFK
QQQ
Communication Services
AFK
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
AFK
QQQ
Energy
AFK
QQQ
Industrials
AFK
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
AFK
QQQ
Healthcare
AFK
QQQ
Real Estate
AFK
QQQ
Utilities
AFK
QQQ
Technology
AFK
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFK vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
AFK
QQQ
AFK vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 2.73 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 3.55 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.47 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 3.71 | -1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.38 | 14.30 | -6.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.73 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.83 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.99 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.41 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
AFK vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFK drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFK and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.46% | -82.97% | +20.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.54% | -11.96% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.54% | -22.77% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.46% | -35.12% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.33% | -35.12% | -18.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.42% | 0.00% | -9.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.04% | -32.79% | +0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 3.11% | +3.34% |
Volatility
AFK vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.48%. This indicates that AFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | 4.48% | +3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.33% | 12.11% | +10.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.62% | 15.95% | +9.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 22.39% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.16% | 22.30% | -0.14% |
AFK vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFK has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFK vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
AFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | 0.98% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 2.27% | 3.59% | 4.17% | 3.91% | 6.34% | 1.71% | 1.99% | 2.67% | 2.16% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFK and QQQ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFK has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to QQQ (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFK dropped -62.46% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.97% vs 5.75% for AFK. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.97% return vs 5.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for AFK.
AFK has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
AFK is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. AFK tracks Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for AFK and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFK and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer