PortfoliosLab logo
AFIF vs. AEMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AFIF and AEMB is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AFIF vs. AEMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and American Century Emerging Markets Bond ETF (AEMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.68%
-6.46%
AFIF
AEMB

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


AFIF

YTD

1.70%

1M

1.53%

6M

2.34%

1Y

6.18%

5Y*

2.56%

10Y*

N/A

AEMB

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AFIF vs. AEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIF has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than AEMB's 0.43% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFIF vs. AEMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFIF is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFIF is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFIF is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFIF is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFIF is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFIF is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

AEMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AEMB is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AEMB is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AEMB is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AEMB is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AEMB is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AEMB is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AFIF vs. AEMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and American Century Emerging Markets Bond ETF (AEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.00
1.09
AFIF
AEMB

Dividends

AFIF vs. AEMB - Dividend Comparison

AFIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, while AEMB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
AFIF
Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF
4.83%5.61%5.91%3.49%1.73%1.25%2.54%0.69%
AEMB
American Century Emerging Markets Bond ETF
2.09%4.08%5.82%5.70%2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AFIF vs. AEMB - Drawdown Comparison


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.16%
-7.74%
AFIF
AEMB

Volatility

AFIF vs. AEMB - Volatility Comparison

Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) has a higher volatility of 2.13% compared to American Century Emerging Markets Bond ETF (AEMB) at 0.00%. This indicates that AFIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.13%
0
AFIF
AEMB