AFGC vs. GIS
AFGC (American Financial Group, Inc.) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. Over the past 5 years, AFGC returned -2.37%/yr vs -5.89%/yr for GIS. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AFGC vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFGC achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -19.35% return.
AFGC
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- -3.34%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 1.92%
- 3Y*
- 1.41%
- 5Y*
- -2.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.19%
GIS
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -20.05%
- YTD
- -19.35%
- 1Y
- -22.41%
- 3Y*
- -17.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.89%
- 10Y*
- -3.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $176.41K | $171.89K | $231.62K | |
| $325.79M | $365.30M | $369.16M |
AFGC vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFGC American Financial Group, Inc. | -2.12% | 1.51% | -4.57% | 14.63% | -20.20% | 3.38% | -3.05% | 16.50% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -19.35% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | -0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFGC and GIS is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019 | 0.11 |
The correlation between AFGC and GIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AFGC:
$1.50B
GIS:
$19.08B
AFGC:
$10.54
GIS:
-$0.16
AFGC:
0.19
GIS:
1.05
AFGC:
0.32
GIS:
2.60
AFGC:
$8.03B
GIS:
$18.42B
AFGC:
$5.11B
GIS:
$6.19B
AFGC:
$689.00M
GIS:
$300.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFGC vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
AFGC
GIS
AFGC vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGC) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFGC | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.87 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.66 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.29 | -1.24 | +1.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFGC vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFGC drawdown since its inception was -50.72%, smaller than the maximum GIS drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFGC and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFGC | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.72% | -59.63% | +8.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -34.28% | +23.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -53.45% | +34.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.43% | -59.63% | +31.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.37% | -54.37% | +41.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.08% | -10.42% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 18.14% | -11.50% |
Volatility
AFGC vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGC) is 2.29%, while General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a volatility of 10.73%. This indicates that AFGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFGC | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 10.73% | -8.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.61% | 22.41% | -16.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.60% | 26.78% | -18.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 22.08% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 22.51% | +1.15% |
Dividends
AFGC vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
AFGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than GIS's 6.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFGC American Financial Group, Inc. | 7.13% | 6.75% | 6.41% | 5.77% | 6.22% | 4.69% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.83% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Financials
AFGC vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Financial Group, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AFGC vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
AFGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
AFGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
AFGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 191.00M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AFGC and GIS have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (10.73%) compared to AFGC (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFGC dropped -50.72% vs GIS's -59.63%.
AFGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFGC and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer