AFGC vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGC) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Performance
AFGC vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AFGC vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFGC American Financial Group, Inc. | -3.24% | 1.51% | -4.57% | 14.63% | -20.20% | 3.38% | -3.05% | 15.58% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -18.83% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 0.49% |
Fundamentals
AFGC:
$1.51B
GIS:
$20.19B
AFGC:
$10.09
GIS:
$4.07
AFGC:
1.79
GIS:
9.15
AFGC:
0.19
GIS:
3.94
AFGC:
0.19
GIS:
1.10
AFGC:
0.31
GIS:
2.16
AFGC:
$7.99B
GIS:
$18.37B
AFGC:
$5.92B
GIS:
$4.70B
AFGC:
$689.00M
GIS:
$3.03B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFGC achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -18.83% return.
AFGC
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -8.80%
- 1Y
- -1.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- -1.96%
- 10Y*
- —
GIS
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -17.71%
- YTD
- -18.83%
- 6M
- -24.20%
- 1Y
- -34.63%
- 3Y*
- -21.16%
- 5Y*
- -6.10%
- 10Y*
- -1.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFGC vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
AFGC
GIS
AFGC vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGC) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFGC | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | -1.46 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | -2.13 | +2.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.75 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | -0.89 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | -1.82 | +1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFGC | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | -1.46 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | -0.29 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.43 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between AFGC and GIS is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AFGC vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
AFGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than GIS's 6.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFGC American Financial Group, Inc. | 7.09% | 6.75% | 6.41% | 5.77% | 6.22% | 4.69% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.53% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Drawdowns
AFGC vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFGC drawdown since its inception was -50.72%, smaller than the maximum GIS drawdown of -55.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFGC and GIS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFGC | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.72% | -55.55% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -37.97% | +27.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.43% | -55.55% | +27.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.36% | -54.07% | +39.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -10.06% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 18.65% | -13.77% |
Volatility
AFGC vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGC) is 2.09%, while General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that AFGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AFGC | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 7.33% | -5.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.40% | 18.36% | -12.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 23.79% | -13.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 20.89% | -3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.20% | 21.97% | +2.23% |
Financials
AFGC vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Financial Group, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities