PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFG vs. CB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AFG vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Financial Group, Inc. (AFG) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFG achieves a -3.31% return, which is significantly lower than CB's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, AFG has outperformed CB with an annualized return of 14.01%, while CB has yielded a comparatively lower 11.41% annualized return.


AFG

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
-3.31%
6M
0.34%
1Y
8.99%
3Y*
9.69%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
14.01%

CB

1D
0.15%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
0.50%
6M
6.65%
1Y
6.88%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFG vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFG
American Financial Group, Inc.
-3.31%5.45%23.79%-7.61%10.91%93.83%-16.18%27.10%-13.04%29.20%
CB
Chubb Limited
0.50%14.46%23.89%4.20%15.97%27.85%1.41%22.94%-9.63%12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AFG and CB is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 1993

0.52

The correlation between AFG and CB shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AFG:

$10.73B

CB:

$123.41B

EPS

AFG:

$10.54

CB:

$28.35

PE Ratio

AFG:

12.23

CB:

11.03

PS Ratio

AFG:

1.32

CB:

2.60

PB Ratio

AFG:

2.29

CB:

1.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

AFG:

$8.15B

CB:

$48.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AFG:

$2.64B

CB:

$17.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

AFG:

$1.26B

CB:

$12.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFG vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFG
AFG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CB
CB Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFG vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFG) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFGCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.08

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

0.74

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.30

1.55

-0.24

AFG vs. CB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is comparable to the CB Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFG and CB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFGCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

0.40

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.71

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.48

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.40

-0.06

Drawdowns

AFG vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFG drawdown since its inception was -62.94%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFG and CB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFGCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.94%

-50.99%

-11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-9.36%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.85%

-14.35%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.85%

-19.26%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.98%

-42.59%

-16.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.30%

-8.49%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.75%

-10.68%

-6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.93%

4.87%

+2.06%

Volatility

AFG vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFG) is 4.27%, while Chubb Limited (CB) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that AFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFGCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

4.57%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

12.54%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.07%

17.33%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.03%

20.28%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.27%

23.65%

+6.62%

Dividends

AFG vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

AFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than CB's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFG
American Financial Group, Inc.
5.39%5.33%6.89%6.81%10.42%20.43%4.39%4.51%4.92%4.41%2.44%2.82%
CB
Chubb Limited
1.24%1.22%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%4.23%

Financials

AFG vs. CB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Financial Group, Inc. and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.85B
1.88B
(AFG) Total Revenue
(CB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AFG and CB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CB has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to AFG (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFG dropped -62.94% vs CB's -50.99%.

AFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFG and CB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer