AFCG vs. SPYI

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

AFCG (AFC Gamma, Inc.) is a stock, while SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past 3 years, AFCG returned -19.56%/yr vs 15.21%/yr for SPYI. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AFCG vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFCG achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than SPYI's 5.51% return.

AFCG

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -12.91%
• YTD: 13.38%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: -26.48%
• 3Y*: -19.56%
• 5Y*: -15.89%
• 10Y*: —

SPYI

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -1.70%
• YTD: 5.51%
• 6M: 4.62%
• 1Y: 18.04%
• 3Y*: 15.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFCG vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AFCG AFC Gamma, Inc.	13.38%	-61.90%	18.70%	-10.49%	-4.99%
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF	5.51%	16.67%	19.03%	18.09%	-3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AFCG and SPYI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2022	0.35

Return for Risk

AFCG vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFCG

AFCG Risk / Return Rank: 27
AFCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
AFCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
AFCG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
AFCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
AFCG Martin Ratio Rank: 29

SPYI

SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 63
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFCG vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AFCG	SPYI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	1.76	-2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	2.41	-2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.34	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	2.35	-2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.77	11.59	-12.35

AFCG vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFCG Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the SPYI Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFCG and SPYI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AFCG vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFCG drawdown since its inception was -78.25%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFCG and SPYI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFCG	SPYI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.25%	-16.47%	-61.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.88%	-7.72%	-49.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-76.86%	-16.47%	-60.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.37%	-2.54%	-63.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.29%	-1.81%	-31.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.66%	1.56%	+33.10%

Volatility

AFCG vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison

AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) at 4.23%. This indicates that AFCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFCG	SPYI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.36%	4.23%	+7.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.78%	8.27%	+34.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.74%	10.29%	+51.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.60%	13.01%	+29.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.88%	13.01%	+29.87%

Dividends

AFCG vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison

AFCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, less than SPYI's 12.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AFCG AFC Gamma, Inc.	11.04%	18.60%	17.04%	16.63%	14.18%	5.76%
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF	12.05%	11.70%	12.04%	12.01%	4.10%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFCG and SPYI in my portfolio?

AFCG and SPYI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFCG or SPYI?

AFCG has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to SPYI (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFCG dropped -78.25% vs SPYI's -16.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.