AFCG vs. ABR
AFCG (AFC Gamma, Inc.) and ABR (Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — AFCG in REIT - Specialty, ABR in REIT - Mortgage. Over the past 5 years, AFCG returned -15.89%/yr vs -13.32%/yr for ABR. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AFCG vs. ABR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFCG achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than ABR's -29.58% return.
AFCG
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -12.91%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- -26.48%
- 3Y*
- -19.56%
- 5Y*
- -15.89%
- 10Y*
- —
ABR
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- YTD
- -29.58%
- 6M
- -31.09%
- 1Y
- -44.53%
- 3Y*
- -19.02%
- 5Y*
- -13.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
AFCG vs. ABR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFCG AFC Gamma, Inc. | 13.38% | -61.90% | 18.70% | -10.49% | -21.23% | 14.82% |
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. | -29.58% | -36.65% | 3.16% | 29.73% | -20.73% | 19.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFCG and ABR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2021 | 0.39 |
The correlation between AFCG and ABR shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AFCG:
$74.59M
ABR:
$1.08B
AFCG:
-$0.88
ABR:
$0.57
AFCG:
12.03
ABR:
1.15
AFCG:
0.40
ABR:
0.46
AFCG:
$5.96M
ABR:
$940.70M
AFCG:
-$4.57M
ABR:
$829.57M
AFCG:
-$4.14M
ABR:
$878.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFCG vs. ABR — Risk / Return Rank
AFCG
ABR
AFCG vs. ABR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFCG | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.80 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | -0.81 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | -1.49 | +0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFCG vs. ABR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFCG drawdown since its inception was -78.25%, smaller than the maximum ABR drawdown of -97.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFCG and ABR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFCG | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.25% | -97.76% | +19.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.88% | -55.18% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.86% | -59.87% | -16.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.25% | -59.87% | -18.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.37% | -59.39% | -6.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.29% | -41.89% | +8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.66% | 29.83% | +4.83% |
Volatility
AFCG vs. ABR - Volatility Comparison
AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) have volatilities of 11.36% and 10.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFCG | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.36% | 10.99% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.78% | 33.77% | +9.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.74% | 41.22% | +20.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.60% | 37.13% | +5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.88% | 40.48% | +2.40% |
Dividends
AFCG vs. ABR - Dividend Comparison
AFCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, less than ABR's 20.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. | 20.90% | 17.14% | 12.42% | 11.07% | 11.68% | 7.53% | 8.67% | 7.94% | 11.22% | 8.33% | 8.31% | 8.11% |
AFCG AFC Gamma, Inc. | 11.04% | 18.60% | 17.04% | 16.63% | 14.18% | 5.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AFCG vs. ABR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AFC Gamma, Inc. and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AFCG vs. ABR - Profitability Comparison
AFCG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AFC Gamma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 9.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ABR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of -21.94M and revenue of 25.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -85.3%.
AFCG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AFC Gamma, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.94M and revenue of 9.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.3%.
ABR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.06M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.
AFCG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AFC Gamma, Inc. reported a net income of 4.83M and revenue of 9.81M, resulting in a net margin of 49.2%.
ABR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 12.92M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AFCG and ABR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFCG has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to ABR (10.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFCG dropped -78.25% vs ABR's -97.76%.
AFCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFCG and ABR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer