PortfoliosLab logo
AFCG vs. ABR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AFCG and ABR is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AFCG vs. ABR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AFCG:

-0.62

ABR:

-0.51

Sortino Ratio

AFCG:

-0.79

ABR:

-0.41

Omega Ratio

AFCG:

0.89

ABR:

0.94

Calmar Ratio

AFCG:

-0.57

ABR:

-0.49

Martin Ratio

AFCG:

-1.36

ABR:

-1.25

Ulcer Index

AFCG:

22.42%

ABR:

14.57%

Daily Std Dev

AFCG:

43.51%

ABR:

38.12%

Max Drawdown

AFCG:

-52.88%

ABR:

-97.75%

Current Drawdown

AFCG:

-48.75%

ABR:

-32.89%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AFCG:

$112.30M

ABR:

$1.89B

EPS

AFCG:

$0.90

ABR:

$1.03

PE Ratio

AFCG:

5.51

ABR:

9.30

PS Ratio

AFCG:

2.74

ABR:

3.09

PB Ratio

AFCG:

0.56

ABR:

0.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

AFCG:

$40.85M

ABR:

$490.88M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AFCG:

$28.79M

ABR:

$444.85M

EBITDA (TTM)

AFCG:

$23.80M

ABR:

$475.21M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFCG achieves a -38.12% return, which is significantly lower than ABR's -26.28% return.


AFCG

YTD

-38.12%

1M

-8.82%

6M

-44.90%

1Y

-27.55%

3Y*

-12.01%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ABR

YTD

-26.28%

1M

-11.08%

6M

-30.40%

1Y

-20.72%

3Y*

-5.82%

5Y*

14.88%

10Y*

13.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AFC Gamma, Inc.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFCG vs. ABR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFCG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFCG is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFCG is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFCG is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFCG is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFCG is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFCG is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

ABR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ABR is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ABR is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ABR is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ABR is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ABR is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ABR is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AFCG vs. ABR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AFCG Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is comparable to the ABR Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFCG and ABR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AFCG vs. ABR - Dividend Comparison

AFCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.53%, more than ABR's 16.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AFCG
AFC Gamma, Inc.
26.53%16.93%22.25%14.00%5.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ABR
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
16.60%12.42%11.07%11.68%7.53%8.67%7.94%10.03%8.33%8.31%8.11%7.68%

Drawdowns

AFCG vs. ABR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFCG drawdown since its inception was -52.88%, smaller than the maximum ABR drawdown of -97.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFCG and ABR.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AFCG vs. ABR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) is 15.28%, while Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) has a volatility of 16.13%. This indicates that AFCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AFCG vs. ABR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AFC Gamma, Inc. and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
5.96M
25.60M
(AFCG) Total Revenue
(ABR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items