AEME.L vs. EUNL.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE).
AEME.L and EUNL.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AEME.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Jun 29, 2016. EUNL.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both AEME.L and EUNL.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AEME.L or EUNL.DE.
Key characteristics
| AEME.L | EUNL.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.11% | 11.15% |
| 1Y Return | 12.86% | 25.24% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -4.52% | 11.35% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.72 | 2.54 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.37% | 9.66% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.09% | -33.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -20.81% | -0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEME.L and EUNL.DE is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AEME.L vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AEME.L achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly lower than EUNL.DE's 11.15% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AEME.L vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AEME.L and EUNL.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AEME.L vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AEME.L vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AEME.L nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AEME.L vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEME.L drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than EUNL.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEME.L and EUNL.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AEME.L vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) at 3.60%. This indicates that AEME.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.