AEMB vs. KLIP
Compare and contrast key facts about American Century Emerging Markets Bond ETF (AEMB) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP).
AEMB and KLIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AEMB is a passively managed fund by American Century that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021. KLIP is managed by CICC. It was launched on Jan 12, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AEMB or KLIP.
Key characteristics
| AEMB | KLIP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.36% | -0.01% |
| 1Y Return | 14.82% | 6.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.81 | 0.44 |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.23% | 15.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.85% | -10.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.53% | -6.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEMB and KLIP is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AEMB vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AEMB achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -0.01% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AEMB vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEMB has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AEMB vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Emerging Markets Bond ETF (AEMB) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AEMB vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison
AEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, less than KLIP's 55.97% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AEMB American Century Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 6.10% | 5.82% | 5.70% | 2.15% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 55.97% | 61.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AEMB vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEMB drawdown since its inception was -27.85%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -10.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMB and KLIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AEMB vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Emerging Markets Bond ETF (AEMB) is 1.84%, while KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that AEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.