AEMB vs. AFIF
Compare and contrast key facts about American Century Emerging Markets Bond ETF (AEMB) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF).
AEMB and AFIF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AEMB is a passively managed fund by American Century that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021. AFIF is an actively managed fund by Regents Park Funds. It was launched on Sep 18, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AEMB or AFIF.
Key characteristics
| AEMB | AFIF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.36% | 6.03% |
| 1Y Return | 14.82% | 10.28% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.23% | 2.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.81 | 4.04 |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.23% | 2.46% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.85% | -10.29% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.53% | -0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEMB and AFIF is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AEMB vs. AFIF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AEMB achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than AFIF's 6.03% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AEMB vs. AFIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEMB has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than AFIF's 1.23% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AEMB vs. AFIF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Emerging Markets Bond ETF (AEMB) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AEMB vs. AFIF - Dividend Comparison
AEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than AFIF's 5.69% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEMB American Century Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 6.10% | 5.82% | 5.70% | 2.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 5.69% | 5.91% | 3.49% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 2.54% | 0.69% |
Drawdowns
AEMB vs. AFIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEMB drawdown since its inception was -27.85%, which is greater than AFIF's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMB and AFIF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AEMB vs. AFIF - Volatility Comparison
American Century Emerging Markets Bond ETF (AEMB) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) at 0.44%. This indicates that AEMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.