Correlation
The correlation between AEM.TO and NA.TO is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
AEM.TO vs. NA.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and National Bank of Canada (NA.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AEM.TO or NA.TO.
Performance
AEM.TO vs. NA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
AEM.TO:
2.73
NA.TO:
1.73
AEM.TO:
3.36
NA.TO:
2.36
AEM.TO:
1.45
NA.TO:
1.37
AEM.TO:
5.92
NA.TO:
1.39
AEM.TO:
19.79
NA.TO:
3.96
AEM.TO:
4.54%
NA.TO:
7.93%
AEM.TO:
31.68%
NA.TO:
18.22%
AEM.TO:
-84.30%
NA.TO:
-61.53%
AEM.TO:
-2.43%
NA.TO:
-2.03%
Fundamentals
AEM.TO:
CA$83.72B
NA.TO:
CA$52.99B
AEM.TO:
CA$6.44
NA.TO:
CA$10.47
AEM.TO:
25.82
NA.TO:
12.93
AEM.TO:
28.26
NA.TO:
6.03
AEM.TO:
9.38
NA.TO:
4.53
AEM.TO:
2.84
NA.TO:
1.69
AEM.TO:
CA$8.92B
NA.TO:
CA$12.67B
AEM.TO:
CA$4.28B
NA.TO:
CA$7.29B
AEM.TO:
CA$2.38B
NA.TO:
CA$131.00M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEM.TO achieves a 48.66% return, which is significantly higher than NA.TO's 4.32% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM.TO has outperformed NA.TO with an annualized return of 17.86%, while NA.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.59% annualized return.
AEM.TO
48.66%
3.23%
48.73%
88.60%
38.50%
17.99%
17.86%
NA.TO
4.32%
4.86%
4.54%
32.10%
20.67%
21.79%
15.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AEM.TO vs. NA.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AEM.TO
NA.TO
AEM.TO vs. NA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and National Bank of Canada (NA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
AEM.TO vs. NA.TO - Dividend Comparison
AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than NA.TO's 3.31% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 0.96% | 1.42% | 2.20% | 2.27% | 2.71% | 1.06% | 0.71% | 0.80% | 0.71% | 0.82% | 0.88% | 1.50% |
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 3.31% | 4.17% | 4.03% | 4.03% | 3.11% | 3.96% | 3.77% | 4.44% | 3.70% | 4.03% | 5.16% | 3.88% |
Drawdowns
AEM.TO vs. NA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -84.30%, which is greater than NA.TO's maximum drawdown of -61.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM.TO and NA.TO.
Loading data...
Volatility
AEM.TO vs. NA.TO - Volatility Comparison
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) at 4.36%. This indicates that AEM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
AEM.TO vs. NA.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and National Bank of Canada. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities