AEM.TO vs. IVN.TO

In the year-to-date period, AEM.TO achieves a 48.66% return, which is significantly higher than IVN.TO's -41.09% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM.TO has underperformed IVN.TO with an annualized return of 17.86%, while IVN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 27.01% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (IVN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the IVN.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM.TO and IVN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while IVN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum AEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -84.30%, smaller than the maximum IVN.TO drawdown of -89.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM.TO and IVN.TO.

The current volatility for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) is 7.86%, while Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (IVN.TO) has a volatility of 25.01%. This indicates that AEM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.