PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEF vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEF vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aberdeen Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund, Inc. (AEF) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEF achieves a 42.52% return, which is significantly higher than T's -6.13% return. Over the past 10 years, AEF has outperformed T with an annualized return of 13.22%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.70% annualized return.


AEF

1D
-3.27%
1M
3.66%
YTD
42.52%
6M
48.08%
1Y
88.63%
3Y*
34.15%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
13.22%

T

1D
3.21%
1M
-9.70%
YTD
-6.13%
6M
-4.67%
1Y
-15.59%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEF vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEF
Aberdeen Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund, Inc.
42.52%50.22%9.43%7.13%-29.63%3.31%11.62%22.83%-16.06%57.92%
T
AT&T Inc.
-6.13%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AEF and T is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.22

The correlation between AEF and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AEF:

$2.74

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

AEF:

3.46

T:

7.49

PEG Ratio

AEF:

0.04

T:

0.31

PS Ratio

AEF:

21.16

T:

1.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEF:

$18.84M

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEF:

-$3.11M

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

AEF:

$119.89M

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEF vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEF
AEF Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEF Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEF Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEF vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund, Inc. (AEF) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

0.90

+0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

-0.66

+5.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.95

-1.40

+18.35

AEF vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEF Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEF and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEF vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEF drawdown since its inception was -63.87%, roughly equal to the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEF and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.87%

-64.15%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.96%

-23.57%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.96%

-23.57%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.20%

-32.01%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.20%

-42.35%

-4.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.65%

-20.80%

+17.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.01%

-15.72%

-8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

11.14%

-5.89%

Volatility

AEF vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Aberdeen Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund, Inc. (AEF) has a higher volatility of 12.83% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 8.49%. This indicates that AEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.83%

8.49%

+4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.94%

18.37%

+5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.79%

22.66%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.95%

24.12%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.91%

23.79%

-1.88%

Dividends

AEF vs. T - Dividend Comparison

AEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, more than T's 4.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEF
Aberdeen Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund, Inc.
8.33%9.29%7.51%7.63%8.54%6.73%3.37%2.23%20.97%5.19%7.05%12.19%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.87%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

AEF vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aberdeen Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
16.17M
33.47B
(AEF) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AEF and T have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEF has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to T (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEF dropped -63.87% vs T's -64.15%.

AEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEF and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer