PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AE50.DE vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AE50.DE vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR (AE50.DE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AE50.DE is traded in EUR, while SPYG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AE50.DE achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 12.19% return. Over the past 10 years, AE50.DE has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 10.59%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.87% annualized return.


AE50.DE

1D
0.71%
1M
3.13%
YTD
11.24%
6M
11.92%
1Y
24.57%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
10.59%

SPYG

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
12.19%
6M
10.92%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
17.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AE50.DE vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AE50.DE
Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR
11.24%18.08%7.63%14.90%-1.62%26.03%-6.38%28.61%-10.46%9.34%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
12.19%7.60%44.97%26.13%-25.04%41.89%22.46%33.80%4.57%11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AE50.DE and SPYG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2014

0.42

The correlation between AE50.DE and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AE50.DE vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AE50.DE
AE50.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AE50.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AE50.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AE50.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AE50.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AE50.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AE50.DE vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR (AE50.DE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AE50.DESPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.18

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

7.48

+1.91

AE50.DE vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AE50.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AE50.DE and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AE50.DE vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AE50.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.20%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -45.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AE50.DE and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AE50.DESPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.20%

-45.25%

+13.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-12.70%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-27.05%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.29%

-27.05%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.20%

-30.75%

-1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.42%

+3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-7.59%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

3.70%

-1.09%

Volatility

AE50.DE vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR (AE50.DE) is 2.91%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that AE50.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AE50.DESPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

6.35%

-3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

12.77%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.38%

17.02%

-3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

21.06%

-7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.87%

21.10%

-6.23%

AE50.DE vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AE50.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AE50.DE vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

AE50.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AE50.DE
Amundi ETF STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.50%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


AE50.DE and SPYG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AE50.DE.

AE50.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. AE50.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 50, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AE50.DE and 0.04% for SPYG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AE50.DE and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer