PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADV vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADV vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advantage Solutions Inc. (ADV) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADV achieves a 63.91% return, which is significantly higher than META's -5.54% return.


ADV

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
63.91%
6M
50.16%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
-10.02%
5Y*
-35.11%
10Y*

META

1D
4.24%
1M
2.06%
YTD
-5.54%
6M
-2.44%
1Y
-6.29%
3Y*
32.06%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADV vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ADV
Advantage Solutions Inc.
63.91%-69.86%-19.34%74.04%-74.06%-39.10%26.63%5.05%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-5.54%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%8.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ADV and META is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2019

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADV:

$471.56M

META:

$1.60T

EPS

ADV:

-$18.50

META:

$27.47

PS Ratio

ADV:

0.13

META:

7.45

PB Ratio

ADV:

0.99

META:

6.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADV:

$3.59B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADV:

$503.34M

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADV:

$78.00M

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADV vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADV
ADV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
ADV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ADV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADV vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advantage Solutions Inc. (ADV) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADVMETADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.07

-0.18

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.81

-0.01

+0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.00

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

-0.19

+0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.17

-0.41

+0.58

ADV vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADV Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADV and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADVMETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

-0.18

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

0.31

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.56

-0.96

Drawdowns

ADV vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADV drawdown since its inception was -96.30%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADV and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADVMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.30%

-76.74%

-19.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.41%

-33.30%

-41.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.28%

-34.15%

-55.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.00%

-76.74%

-19.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.35%

-20.96%

-68.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.73%

-15.25%

-41.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.21%

15.47%

+24.74%

Volatility

ADV vs. META - Volatility Comparison

Advantage Solutions Inc. (ADV) has a higher volatility of 28.41% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 8.84%. This indicates that ADV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADVMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.41%

8.84%

+19.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.48%

26.58%

+47.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.55%

35.23%

+61.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.12%

43.99%

+26.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.18%

38.64%

+23.54%

Dividends

ADV vs. META - Dividend Comparison

ADV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM20252024
ADV
Advantage Solutions Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.34%0.32%0.34%

Financials

ADV vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Advantage Solutions Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
869.60M
56.31B
(ADV) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ADV vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Advantage Solutions Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
12.4%
81.9%
Portfolio components
ADV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advantage Solutions Inc. reported a gross profit of 108.03M and revenue of 869.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.4%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

ADV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advantage Solutions Inc. reported an operating income of 4.16M and revenue of 869.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

ADV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advantage Solutions Inc. reported a net income of -71.83M and revenue of 869.60M, resulting in a net margin of -8.3%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ADV and META have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADV has higher volatility (28.41%) compared to META (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADV dropped -96.30% vs META's -76.74%.

ADV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADV and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer