PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADMA vs. ^NIFTY500
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ADMA vs. ^NIFTY500 - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and Nifty 500 (^NIFTY500). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ADMA is traded in USD, while ^NIFTY500 is traded in INR. To make them comparable, the ^NIFTY500 values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADMA achieves a -56.25% return, which is significantly lower than ^NIFTY500's -11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ADMA has underperformed ^NIFTY500 with an annualized return of 0.72%, while ^NIFTY500 has yielded a comparatively higher 8.68% annualized return.


ADMA

1D
2.84%
1M
-22.15%
YTD
-56.25%
6M
-60.32%
1Y
-60.75%
3Y*
25.57%
5Y*
35.61%
10Y*
0.72%

^NIFTY500

1D
0.67%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
-11.60%
6M
-11.14%
1Y
-11.56%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
8.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADMA vs. ^NIFTY500 - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
-56.25%6.36%279.42%16.49%175.18%-27.69%-51.25%67.36%-25.55%-37.30%
^NIFTY500
Nifty 500
-11.60%1.60%12.00%25.12%-6.42%26.44%14.14%4.96%-11.46%44.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ADMA and ^NIFTY500 is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2013

0.08

The correlation between ADMA and ^NIFTY500 shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADMA vs. ^NIFTY500 — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADMA
ADMA Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ADMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADMA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ADMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADMA Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

^NIFTY500
^NIFTY500 Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
^NIFTY500 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NIFTY500 Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NIFTY500 Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
^NIFTY500 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NIFTY500 Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADMA vs. ^NIFTY500 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and Nifty 500 (^NIFTY500). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADMA^NIFTY500Difference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.88

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

-0.56

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.83

-1.39

-0.44

ADMA vs. ^NIFTY500 - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADMA Sharpe Ratio is -1.11, which is lower than the ^NIFTY500 Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADMA and ^NIFTY500, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADMA^NIFTY500Difference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.11

-0.74

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.32

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

0.49

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.22

-0.23

Drawdowns

ADMA vs. ^NIFTY500 - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADMA drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, which is greater than ^NIFTY500's maximum drawdown of -72.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADMA and ^NIFTY500.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMA^NIFTY500Difference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.28%

-72.89%

-18.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.25%

-21.23%

-44.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.99%

-25.65%

-43.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.99%

-25.65%

-43.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.11%

-47.22%

-38.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.44%

-19.81%

-47.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.04%

-22.20%

-30.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.14%

8.38%

+24.76%

Volatility

ADMA vs. ^NIFTY500 - Volatility Comparison

ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) has a higher volatility of 20.75% compared to Nifty 500 (^NIFTY500) at 5.18%. This indicates that ADMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NIFTY500 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADMA^NIFTY500Difference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.75%

5.18%

+15.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.51%

13.81%

+31.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.75%

15.86%

+38.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.47%

15.85%

+43.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.02%

18.12%

+50.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADMA and ^NIFTY500 have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADMA has higher volatility (20.75%) compared to ^NIFTY500 (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADMA dropped -91.28% vs ^NIFTY500's -72.89%.

^NIFTY500 currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.74 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADMA and ^NIFTY500

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer