PortfoliosLab logo
ADA-USD vs. HBAR-USD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ADA-USD and HBAR-USD is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ADA-USD vs. HBAR-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cardano (ADA-USD) and HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ADA-USD:

0.78

HBAR-USD:

0.79

Sortino Ratio

ADA-USD:

3.27

HBAR-USD:

4.69

Omega Ratio

ADA-USD:

1.35

HBAR-USD:

1.45

Calmar Ratio

ADA-USD:

2.23

HBAR-USD:

6.50

Martin Ratio

ADA-USD:

10.39

HBAR-USD:

23.27

Ulcer Index

ADA-USD:

29.01%

HBAR-USD:

32.79%

Daily Std Dev

ADA-USD:

95.71%

HBAR-USD:

106.48%

Max Drawdown

ADA-USD:

-97.85%

HBAR-USD:

-92.80%

Current Drawdown

ADA-USD:

-71.98%

HBAR-USD:

-57.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADA-USD achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly higher than HBAR-USD's -19.39% return.


ADA-USD

YTD

-1.45%

1M

30.98%

6M

43.68%

1Y

94.26%

5Y*

75.19%

10Y*

N/A

HBAR-USD

YTD

-19.39%

1M

31.07%

6M

263.81%

1Y

105.69%

5Y*

43.27%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ADA-USD vs. HBAR-USD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADA-USD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ADA-USD is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ADA-USD is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ADA-USD is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ADA-USD is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ADA-USD is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ADA-USD is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HBAR-USD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HBAR-USD is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HBAR-USD is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HBAR-USD is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HBAR-USD is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HBAR-USD is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HBAR-USD is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ADA-USD vs. HBAR-USD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardano (ADA-USD) and HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ADA-USD Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the HBAR-USD Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADA-USD and HBAR-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

ADA-USD vs. HBAR-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADA-USD drawdown since its inception was -97.85%, which is greater than HBAR-USD's maximum drawdown of -92.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADA-USD and HBAR-USD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ADA-USD vs. HBAR-USD - Volatility Comparison

Cardano (ADA-USD) and HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD) have volatilities of 20.41% and 19.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...