ACVF vs. QQQ
ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACVF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Ridgeline Research LLC, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. ACVF is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACVF returned 12.66%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
ACVF vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACVF achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return.
ACVF
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 6.31%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- 12.23%
- 1Y
- 21.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
ACVF vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 11.18% | 13.67% | 20.56% | 23.81% | -15.74% | 28.84% | 13.79% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.62% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 13.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACVF and QQQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between ACVF and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
ACVF vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACVF
QQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
ACVF
QQQ
Financial Services
ACVF
QQQ
Industrials
ACVF
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
ACVF
QQQ
Healthcare
ACVF
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
ACVF
QQQ
Communication Services
ACVF
QQQ
Energy
ACVF
QQQ
Utilities
ACVF
QQQ
Real Estate
ACVF
QQQ
Basic Materials
ACVF
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACVF vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
ACVF
QQQ
ACVF vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACVF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 2.73 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.72 | 3.55 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.47 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.71 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.75 | 14.30 | -2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACVF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.73 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.83 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.41 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
ACVF vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACVF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -82.97% | +58.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.70% | -11.96% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -22.77% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | -35.12% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -32.79% | +28.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 3.11% | -1.22% |
Volatility
ACVF vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is 3.06%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that ACVF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACVF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 4.48% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 12.11% | -3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.39% | 15.95% | -4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 22.39% | -6.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 22.30% | -6.33% |
ACVF vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACVF vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 0.53% | 0.59% | 0.59% | 0.82% | 0.93% | 0.61% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACVF and QQQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to ACVF (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVF dropped -24.39% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 18.43% vs 12.66% for ACVF. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, ACVF has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 12.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACVF.
ACVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
ACVF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Ridgeline Research LLC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACVF and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACVF and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer