ACVF vs. BSJO
ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) and BSJO (Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACVF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Ridgeline Research LLC, while BSJO is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2024 TR Index. ACVF is actively managed, while BSJO is passively managed. ACVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJO.
Performance
ACVF vs. BSJO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACVF
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 16.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACVF vs. BSJO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 9.61% |
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACVF vs. BSJO — Risk / Return Rank
ACVF
BSJO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACVF vs. BSJO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACVF | BSJO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACVF vs. BSJO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, which is greater than BSJO's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and BSJO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACVF | BSJO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | 0.00% | -24.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | 0.00% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | 0.00% | -4.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | — | — |
Volatility
ACVF vs. BSJO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACVF | BSJO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 0.00% | +12.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 0.00% | +16.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 0.00% | +16.01% |
ACVF vs. BSJO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJO's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACVF vs. BSJO - Dividend Comparison
ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while BSJO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.59% | 0.82% | 0.93% | 0.61% | 0.23% |
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BSJO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSJO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACVF.
ACVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for BSJO.
ACVF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BSJO is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Ridgeline Research LLC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACVF and 0.42% for BSJO.
Find the right allocation for ACVF and BSJO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer