ACRS vs. BFLY

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ACRS (Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.) and BFLY (Butterfly Network, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — ACRS in Biotechnology, BFLY in Medical Devices. Over the past 5 years, ACRS returned -19.02%/yr vs -7.92%/yr for BFLY. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

ACRS vs. BFLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS) and Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACRS achieves a 72.76% return, which is significantly lower than BFLY's 87.11% return.

ACRS

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: -6.47%
• 6M: 48.15%
• YTD: 72.76%
• 1Y: 239.87%
• 3Y*: -19.07%
• 5Y*: -19.02%
• 10Y*: -12.11%
• ALL TIME*: -7.40%

BFLY

• 1D: -12.97%
• 1M: -7.42%
• 6M: 79.55%
• YTD: 87.11%
• 1Y: 407.86%
• 3Y*: 40.56%
• 5Y*: -7.92%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -5.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACRS Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.	$8.58M	$9.53M	$8.25M
BFLY Butterfly Network, Inc.	$49.93M	$59.25M	$54.27M

ACRS vs. BFLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACRS Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.	72.76%	21.37%	136.19%	-93.33%	8.32%	124.73%	226.77%
BFLY Butterfly Network, Inc.	87.11%	21.79%	188.89%	-56.10%	-63.23%	-66.20%	94.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ACRS and BFLY is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020	0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap ACRS : $726.25M BFLY : $1.89B
EPS ACRS : -$0.56 BFLY : -$0.29
PS Ratio ACRS : 77.50 BFLY : 16.76
PB Ratio ACRS : 4.66 BFLY : 9.84
Total Revenue (TTM) ACRS : $8.37M BFLY : $108.56M
Gross Profit (TTM) ACRS : $6.39M BFLY : $55.45M
EBITDA (TTM) ACRS : -$73.08M BFLY : -$69.02M

Return for Risk

ACRS vs. BFLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACRS

ACRS Risk / Return Rank: 96
ACRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ACRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ACRS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
ACRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ACRS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

BFLY

BFLY Risk / Return Rank: 96
BFLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BFLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
BFLY Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BFLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
BFLY Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACRS vs. BFLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS) and Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACRS	BFLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.54	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.75	3.46	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.42	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.59	7.84	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.05	19.14	-1.08

ACRS vs. BFLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACRS Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the BFLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACRS and BFLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACRS vs. BFLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACRS drawdown since its inception was -98.05%, roughly equal to the maximum BFLY drawdown of -97.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACRS and BFLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACRS	BFLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.05%	-97.40%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.64%	-40.61%	+3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-93.45%	-72.41%	-21.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.57%	-94.68%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.24%	-73.80%	-10.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.91%	-75.88%	+11.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.35%	17.29%	-3.94%

Volatility

ACRS vs. BFLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS) is 14.22%, while Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) has a volatility of 28.54%. This indicates that ACRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACRS	BFLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.22%	28.54%	-14.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.25%	88.73%	-44.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.44%	125.63%	-29.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.32%	102.15%	-9.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	110.39%	97.82%	+12.57%

Dividends

ACRS vs. BFLY - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACRS nor BFLY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACRS and BFLY in my portfolio?

ACRS and BFLY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACRS or BFLY?

BFLY has higher volatility (28.54%) compared to ACRS (14.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACRS dropped -98.05% vs BFLY's -97.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BFLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.