PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ACRE vs. RYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ACRE and RYLD is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

ACRE vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-19.73%
8.77%
ACRE
RYLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACRE:

-1.00

RYLD:

1.28

Sortino Ratio

ACRE:

-1.37

RYLD:

1.80

Omega Ratio

ACRE:

0.84

RYLD:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

ACRE:

-0.66

RYLD:

0.76

Martin Ratio

ACRE:

-1.28

RYLD:

8.16

Ulcer Index

ACRE:

28.07%

RYLD:

1.66%

Daily Std Dev

ACRE:

36.00%

RYLD:

10.59%

Max Drawdown

ACRE:

-75.68%

RYLD:

-41.53%

Current Drawdown

ACRE:

-52.56%

RYLD:

-4.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACRE achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 1.84% return.


ACRE

YTD

-3.74%

1M

-13.39%

6M

-19.41%

1Y

-34.17%

5Y*

-10.52%

10Y*

1.57%

RYLD

YTD

1.84%

1M

0.11%

6M

8.98%

1Y

14.55%

5Y*

3.44%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACRE vs. RYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACRE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACRE is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACRE is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACRE is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACRE is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACRE is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACRE is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RYLD is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RYLD is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RYLD is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RYLD is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RYLD is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RYLD is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACRE vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ACRE, currently valued at -1.00, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-1.001.28
The chart of Sortino ratio for ACRE, currently valued at -1.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.371.80
The chart of Omega ratio for ACRE, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.841.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for ACRE, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.660.76
The chart of Martin ratio for ACRE, currently valued at -1.28, compared to the broader market-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.00-1.288.16
ACRE
RYLD

The current ACRE Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACRE and RYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.00
1.28
ACRE
RYLD

Dividends

ACRE vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

ACRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.64%, more than RYLD's 11.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ACRE
Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation
17.64%16.98%12.93%7.00%2.68%11.08%8.33%8.90%8.37%7.57%8.74%8.71%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.81%12.03%12.65%13.50%12.35%10.77%6.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ACRE vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACRE drawdown since its inception was -75.68%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACRE and RYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-52.56%
-4.96%
ACRE
RYLD

Volatility

ACRE vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) has a higher volatility of 13.41% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 4.31%. This indicates that ACRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
13.41%
4.31%
ACRE
RYLD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab