PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACRE vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACRE vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACRE achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 8.33% return.


ACRE

1D
-2.78%
1M
-6.68%
YTD
5.57%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
18.18%
3Y*
-8.54%
5Y*
-10.57%
10Y*
2.20%

RYLD

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.78%
YTD
8.33%
6M
9.14%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
7.45%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACRE vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ACRE
Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation
5.57%-7.92%-34.00%15.56%-20.44%34.30%-13.84%10.22%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
8.33%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%-0.44%8.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ACRE and RYLD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019

0.52

The correlation between ACRE and RYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACRE vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACRE
ACRE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ACRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACRE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ACRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACRE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACRE vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACRERYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.42

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

3.43

-2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.18

13.86

-11.68

ACRE vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACRE and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACRERYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

2.03

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.19

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.32

-0.30

Drawdowns

ACRE vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACRE drawdown since its inception was -75.68%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACRE and RYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACRERYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.68%

-41.53%

-34.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.69%

-6.29%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

-19.05%

-42.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.51%

-21.33%

-46.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.55%

-0.19%

-48.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-8.84%

-10.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.36%

1.55%

+6.81%

Volatility

ACRE vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.02%. This indicates that ACRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACRERYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.64%

2.02%

+7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.57%

7.60%

+15.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.00%

10.67%

+26.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.67%

14.03%

+21.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.01%

17.20%

+27.81%

Dividends

ACRE vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

ACRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.27%, more than RYLD's 11.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACRE
Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation
12.27%12.55%16.98%13.13%13.61%9.63%11.08%8.33%8.90%8.37%7.57%8.74%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.65%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACRE and RYLD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACRE has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to RYLD (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACRE dropped -75.68% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACRE and RYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer