ACM vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about AECOM (ACM) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ACM or IVV.
Performance
ACM vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACM achieves a 19.57% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 25.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACM having a 12.82% annualized return and IVV not far ahead at 13.13%.
ACM
19.57%
1.84%
23.25%
27.22%
21.46%
12.82%
IVV
25.50%
1.17%
12.21%
32.17%
15.57%
13.13%
Key characteristics
| ACM | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.27 | 2.62 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.87 | 3.51 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.23 | 1.49 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.72 | 3.79 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.67 | 17.04 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.83% | 1.87% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.50% | 12.16% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.97% | -55.25% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.07% | -1.35% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between ACM and IVV is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ACM vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AECOM (ACM) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ACM vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
ACM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than IVV's 1.25% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACM AECOM | 0.80% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.25% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.99% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% | 1.83% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
ACM vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACM drawdown since its inception was -59.97%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACM and IVV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ACM vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
AECOM (ACM) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.09%. This indicates that ACM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.