PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACLS vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACLS vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLS achieves a 112.92% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 8.46% return. Over the past 10 years, ACLS has outperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 32.01%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively lower 30.05% annualized return.


ACLS

1D
-6.99%
1M
9.00%
YTD
112.92%
6M
104.37%
1Y
157.12%
3Y*
0.51%
5Y*
34.01%
10Y*
32.01%

AAPL

1D
-0.91%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
8.46%
6M
8.26%
1Y
46.63%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
17.74%
10Y*
30.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLS vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
112.92%14.98%-46.13%63.42%6.44%156.04%20.83%35.39%-37.98%97.25%
AAPL
Apple Inc
8.46%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ACLS and AAPL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2000

0.38

The correlation between ACLS and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACLS:

$5.30B

AAPL:

$4.35T

EPS

ACLS:

$3.21

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

ACLS:

53.27

AAPL:

35.73

PEG Ratio

ACLS:

3.13

AAPL:

4.70

PS Ratio

ACLS:

6.36

AAPL:

9.70

PB Ratio

ACLS:

5.07

AAPL:

40.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACLS:

$845.44M

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACLS:

$368.66M

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

ACLS:

$129.11M

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACLS vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLS
ACLS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ACLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLS vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACLSAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.03

3.40

+2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

8.35

+5.57

ACLS vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLS Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLS and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACLS vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLS drawdown since its inception was -99.38%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLS and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACLSAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.38%

-81.80%

-17.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.20%

-13.80%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.84%

-33.36%

-45.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.84%

-33.36%

-45.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.84%

-38.52%

-40.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.67%

-6.63%

-8.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.43%

-29.58%

-43.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.34%

5.60%

+5.74%

Volatility

ACLS vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) has a higher volatility of 24.47% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 6.98%. This indicates that ACLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACLSAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.47%

6.98%

+17.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.71%

16.62%

+33.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.36%

22.57%

+36.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.42%

27.52%

+27.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.76%

28.92%

+24.84%

Dividends

ACLS vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

ACLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.36%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ACLS vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
198.96M
111.18B
(ACLS) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACLS vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%42.0%44.0%46.0%48.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
40.5%
49.3%
Portfolio components
ACLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.58M and revenue of 198.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

ACLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.95M and revenue of 198.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

ACLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 9.21M and revenue of 198.96M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACLS and AAPL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACLS has higher volatility (24.47%) compared to AAPL (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLS dropped -99.38% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

ACLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACLS and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer