ACKAY vs. VOO
ACKAY (Arcelik AS ADR) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, ACKAY returned -7.91%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACKAY vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACKAY achieves a -11.04% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ACKAY has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -7.91%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
ACKAY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -10.63%
- YTD
- -11.04%
- 6M
- -8.67%
- 1Y
- -32.43%
- 3Y*
- -21.92%
- 5Y*
- -7.18%
- 10Y*
- -7.91%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
ACKAY vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACKAY Arcelik AS ADR | -11.04% | -37.13% | -3.91% | -18.01% | 54.11% | 4.93% | 11.86% | 23.79% | -47.22% | -1.89% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACKAY and VOO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.06 |
The correlation between ACKAY and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.08 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACKAY vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
ACKAY
VOO
ACKAY vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcelik AS ADR (ACKAY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACKAY | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | 2.39 | -3.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | 3.25 | -4.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.43 | -0.64 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 3.16 | -4.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 14.73 | -16.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACKAY | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | 2.39 | -3.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.83 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.16 | 0.87 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.89 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
ACKAY vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACKAY drawdown since its inception was -75.63%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACKAY and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACKAY | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.63% | -33.99% | -41.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.17% | -8.90% | -28.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.88% | -18.69% | -44.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.66% | -24.52% | -41.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.63% | -33.99% | -41.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.35% | -0.70% | -63.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.06% | -3.69% | -24.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.99% | 1.91% | +20.08% |
Volatility
ACKAY vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Arcelik AS ADR (ACKAY) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that ACKAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACKAY | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.15% | 2.84% | +9.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.06% | 8.90% | +27.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.74% | 11.80% | +37.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.15% | 16.81% | +34.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.12% | 18.01% | +31.11% |
Dividends
ACKAY vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
ACKAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACKAY Arcelik AS ADR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 8.23% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 4.71% | 5.53% | 1.78% | 3.33% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACKAY and VOO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACKAY has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACKAY dropped -75.63% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACKAY and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer