ACI vs. FAT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ACI (Albertsons Companies, Inc.) and FAT (FAT Brands Inc.) are both stocks. ACI operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while FAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, ACI returned 3.19%/yr vs -48.69%/yr for FAT. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ACI vs. FAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACI achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly higher than FAT's -48.32% return.

ACI

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -6.20%
• YTD: -7.47%
• 6M: -10.99%
• 1Y: -26.75%
• 3Y*: -6.15%
• 5Y*: 3.19%
• 10Y*: —

FAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -48.32%
• 6M: -73.93%
• 1Y: -92.54%
• 3Y*: -62.32%
• 5Y*: -48.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACI vs. FAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACI Albertsons Companies, Inc.	-7.47%	-9.96%	-12.54%	13.42%	-6.81%	75.18%	14.57%
FAT FAT Brands Inc.	-48.32%	-89.39%	-3.66%	32.64%	-50.03%	86.50%	84.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ACI and FAT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2020	0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap ACI : $7.95B FAT : $2.91M
EPS ACI : $0.40 FAT : -$12.65
PS Ratio ACI : 0.10 FAT : 0.01
Total Revenue (TTM) ACI : $83.17B FAT : $574.14M
Gross Profit (TTM) ACI : $22.18B FAT : $157.40M
EBITDA (TTM) ACI : $3.42B FAT : -$45.08M

Return for Risk

ACI vs. FAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACI

ACI Risk / Return Rank: 7
ACI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ACI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
ACI Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ACI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ACI Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FAT

FAT Risk / Return Rank: 3
FAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FAT Omega Ratio Rank: 0
FAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FAT Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACI vs. FAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACI	FAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.92	-0.95	+0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.38	-2.54	+1.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	0.56	+0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	-0.99	+0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.39	-1.38	-0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACI vs. FAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACI Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is comparable to the FAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACI and FAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACI	FAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.92	-0.95	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	-0.74	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	-0.41	+0.66

Drawdowns

ACI vs. FAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACI drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, smaller than the maximum FAT drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACI and FAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACI	FAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.32%	-97.48%	+60.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.61%	-94.21%	+64.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.66%	-96.59%	+66.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.32%	-97.48%	+60.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.84%	-97.48%	+60.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.48%	-49.83%	+31.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.70%	67.25%	-47.55%

Volatility

ACI vs. FAT - Volatility Comparison

Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) at 0.00%. This indicates that ACI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACI	FAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.77%	0.00%	+8.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.55%	97.93%	-77.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.27%	97.68%	-68.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.28%	66.34%	-36.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.26%	77.28%	-46.02%

Dividends

ACI vs. FAT - Dividend Comparison

ACI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, while FAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ACI Albertsons Companies, Inc.	3.98%	3.49%	2.44%	2.09%	35.34%	1.39%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%
FAT FAT Brands Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	10.53%	9.24%	10.92%	4.91%	0.00%	2.64%	7.66%

Financials

ACI vs. FAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Albertsons Companies, Inc. and FAT Brands Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ACI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albertsons Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.09B and revenue of 20.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

FAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 37.49M and revenue of 140.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.

ACI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albertsons Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of -490.20M and revenue of 20.25B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.4%.

FAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported an operating income of -17.34M and revenue of 140.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.4%.

ACI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albertsons Companies, Inc. reported a net income of -480.80M and revenue of 20.25B, resulting in a net margin of -2.4%.

FAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported a net income of -58.22M and revenue of 140.01M, resulting in a net margin of -41.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACI and FAT in my portfolio?

ACI and FAT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACI or FAT?

ACI has higher volatility (8.77%) compared to FAT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACI dropped -37.32% vs FAT's -97.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.92 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.