ACGL vs. ETN

In the year-to-date period, ACGL achieves a 35.49% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 52.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ACGL has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 18.20%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 21.55% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ACGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACGL and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ACGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than ETN's 1.03% yield.

The maximum ACGL drawdown since its inception was -54.73%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGL and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 8.56%. This indicates that ACGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arch Capital Group Ltd. and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.