PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACB vs. SNDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACB vs. SNDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACB achieves a -31.99% return, which is significantly lower than SNDL's -15.66% return.


ACB

1D
-2.05%
1M
-17.05%
YTD
-31.99%
6M
-38.81%
1Y
-29.66%
3Y*
-19.55%
5Y*
-49.82%
10Y*
-23.86%

SNDL

1D
-1.41%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
-15.66%
6M
-21.79%
1Y
12.00%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
-32.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACB vs. SNDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ACB
Aurora Cannabis Inc.
-31.99%-0.71%-10.75%-48.38%-82.95%-34.90%-67.94%-65.44%
SNDL
Sundial Growers Inc.
-15.66%-7.26%9.15%-21.53%-63.86%22.13%-84.27%-76.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ACB and SNDL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.62

The correlation between ACB and SNDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACB:

$164.94M

SNDL:

$365.82M

EPS

ACB:

-CA$1.33

SNDL:

-CA$0.04

PS Ratio

ACB:

0.74

SNDL:

0.55

PB Ratio

ACB:

0.46

SNDL:

0.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACB:

CA$310.87M

SNDL:

CA$940.66M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACB:

CA$176.08M

SNDL:

CA$242.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

ACB:

CA$10.48M

SNDL:

CA$43.64M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACB vs. SNDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACB
ACB Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ACB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACB Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ACB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACB Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SNDL
SNDL Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SNDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACB vs. SNDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACBSNDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.10

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

0.22

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

0.33

-1.27

ACB vs. SNDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACB Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the SNDL Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACB and SNDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACB vs. SNDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACB drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum SNDL drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACB and SNDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACBSNDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-99.07%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.93%

-54.17%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.80%

-54.34%

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.93%

-87.90%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.80%

-98.92%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.71%

-94.44%

+23.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.63%

35.99%

-4.36%

Volatility

ACB vs. SNDL - Volatility Comparison

Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) has a higher volatility of 12.65% compared to Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL) at 6.77%. This indicates that ACB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACBSNDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.65%

6.77%

+5.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.60%

30.79%

+6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.40%

68.40%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.74%

70.52%

+19.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.78%

114.79%

-17.01%

Dividends

ACB vs. SNDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACB nor SNDL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ACB vs. SNDL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aurora Cannabis Inc. and Sundial Growers Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
38.11M
199.17M
(ACB) Total Revenue
(SNDL) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ACB and SNDL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACB has higher volatility (12.65%) compared to SNDL (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACB dropped -99.80% vs SNDL's -99.07%.

SNDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACB and SNDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer