PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ACB vs. FLGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ACBFLGC
YTD Return93.83%25.19%
1Y Return52.79%-57.73%
Sharpe Ratio0.42-0.39
Daily Std Dev126.92%154.02%
Max Drawdown-99.80%-99.81%
Current Drawdown-99.35%-99.51%

Fundamentals


ACBFLGC
Market Cap$366.95M$17.43M
EPS-$57.77-$6.34
Revenue (TTM)$275.88M$76.07M
Gross Profit (TTM)$21.23M$2.43M
EBITDA (TTM)-$33.33M-$8.36M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between ACB and FLGC is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ACB vs. FLGC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ACB achieves a 93.83% return, which is significantly higher than FLGC's 25.19% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-100.00%-98.00%-96.00%-94.00%-92.00%-90.00%-88.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-88.70%
-98.24%
ACB
FLGC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Aurora Cannabis Inc.

Flora Growth Corp.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACB vs. FLGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ACB, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.42
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ACB, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ACB, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ACB, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ACB, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.26
FLGC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLGC, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLGC, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLGC, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLGC, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLGC, currently valued at -0.93, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.93

ACB vs. FLGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACB Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the FLGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ACB and FLGC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.40NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.42
-0.39
ACB
FLGC

Dividends

ACB vs. FLGC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACB nor FLGC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ACB vs. FLGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACB drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum FLGC drawdown of -99.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACB and FLGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-98.00%-96.00%-94.00%-92.00%-90.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-90.98%
-99.51%
ACB
FLGC

Volatility

ACB vs. FLGC - Volatility Comparison

Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) has a higher volatility of 60.89% compared to Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC) at 53.51%. This indicates that ACB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
60.89%
53.51%
ACB
FLGC

Financials

ACB vs. FLGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aurora Cannabis Inc. and Flora Growth Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items