PortfoliosLab logo
ACB vs. FLGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ACB and FLGC is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ACB vs. FLGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-98.00%-96.00%-94.00%-92.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-94.06%
-99.29%
ACB
FLGC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACB:

-0.37

FLGC:

-0.52

Sortino Ratio

ACB:

-0.09

FLGC:

-0.39

Omega Ratio

ACB:

0.99

FLGC:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

ACB:

-0.27

FLGC:

-0.55

Martin Ratio

ACB:

-0.82

FLGC:

-1.21

Ulcer Index

ACB:

33.26%

FLGC:

45.09%

Daily Std Dev

ACB:

77.83%

FLGC:

102.81%

Max Drawdown

ACB:

-99.80%

FLGC:

-99.87%

Current Drawdown

ACB:

-99.66%

FLGC:

-99.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACB:

$259.05M

FLGC:

$12.24M

EPS

ACB:

$0.20

FLGC:

-$1.30

PS Ratio

ACB:

0.81

FLGC:

0.21

PB Ratio

ACB:

0.64

FLGC:

2.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACB:

$252.76M

FLGC:

$41.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACB:

$165.71M

FLGC:

$8.64M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACB achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than FLGC's -34.09% return.


ACB

YTD

14.12%

1M

13.85%

6M

0.62%

1Y

-28.78%

5Y*

-43.07%

10Y*

-19.29%

FLGC

YTD

-34.09%

1M

38.55%

6M

-46.54%

1Y

-53.50%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACB vs. FLGC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACB is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACB is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACB is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACB is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACB is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACB is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLGC is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLGC is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLGC is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLGC is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLGC is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLGC is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACB vs. FLGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ACB Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is comparable to the FLGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACB and FLGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.37
-0.52
ACB
FLGC

Dividends

ACB vs. FLGC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACB nor FLGC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ACB vs. FLGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACB drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum FLGC drawdown of -99.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACB and FLGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-99.00%-98.00%-97.00%-96.00%-95.00%-94.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-95.26%
-99.80%
ACB
FLGC

Volatility

ACB vs. FLGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) is 13.49%, while Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC) has a volatility of 26.49%. This indicates that ACB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.49%
26.49%
ACB
FLGC

Financials

ACB vs. FLGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aurora Cannabis Inc. and Flora Growth Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
88.20M
13.33M
(ACB) Total Revenue
(FLGC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACB vs. FLGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aurora Cannabis Inc. and Flora Growth Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
89.6%
19.8%
(ACB) Gross Margin
(FLGC) Gross Margin
ACB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.00M and revenue of 88.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.6%.

FLGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flora Growth Corp. reported a gross profit of 2.64M and revenue of 13.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

ACB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported an operating income of 37.68M and revenue of 88.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

FLGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flora Growth Corp. reported an operating income of -5.93M and revenue of 13.33M, resulting in an operating margin of -44.5%.

ACB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported a net income of 31.67M and revenue of 88.20M, resulting in a net margin of 35.9%.

FLGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flora Growth Corp. reported a net income of -6.13M and revenue of 13.33M, resulting in a net margin of -46.0%.