ACB vs. FLGC

In the year-to-date period, ACB achieves a -10.33% return, which is significantly higher than FLGC's -22.22% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ACB Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the FLGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACB and FLGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ACB nor FLGC has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ACB drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum FLGC drawdown of -99.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACB and FLGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) is 13.49%, while Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC) has a volatility of 50.99%. This indicates that ACB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aurora Cannabis Inc. and Flora Growth Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.