PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ACB vs. CGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ACB and CGC is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

ACB vs. CGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-95.00%-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-90.28%
-93.58%
ACB
CGC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACB:

-0.26

CGC:

-0.67

Sortino Ratio

ACB:

0.25

CGC:

-1.55

Omega Ratio

ACB:

1.03

CGC:

0.82

Calmar Ratio

ACB:

-0.25

CGC:

-0.82

Martin Ratio

ACB:

-0.58

CGC:

-1.18

Ulcer Index

ACB:

42.77%

CGC:

69.98%

Daily Std Dev

ACB:

95.31%

CGC:

121.97%

Max Drawdown

ACB:

-99.80%

CGC:

-99.85%

Current Drawdown

ACB:

-99.69%

CGC:

-99.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACB:

$243.69M

CGC:

$214.56M

EPS

ACB:

$0.19

CGC:

-$3.62

PS Ratio

ACB:

0.76

CGC:

0.78

PB Ratio

ACB:

0.59

CGC:

0.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACB:

$252.76M

CGC:

$215.45M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACB:

$165.71M

CGC:

$68.97M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACB achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly higher than CGC's -56.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ACB has outperformed CGC with an annualized return of -20.13%, while CGC has yielded a comparatively lower -23.37% annualized return.


ACB

YTD

4.47%

1M

2.30%

6M

-20.57%

1Y

-32.06%

5Y*

-44.38%

10Y*

-20.13%

CGC

YTD

-56.57%

1M

4.39%

6M

-73.20%

1Y

-84.80%

5Y*

-62.13%

10Y*

-23.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACB vs. CGC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACB is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACB is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACB is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACB is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACB is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACB is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGC is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGC is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGC is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGC is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGC is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGC is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACB vs. CGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ACB, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
ACB: -0.26
CGC: -0.67
The chart of Sortino ratio for ACB, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
ACB: 0.25
CGC: -1.55
The chart of Omega ratio for ACB, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
ACB: 1.03
CGC: 0.82
The chart of Calmar ratio for ACB, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
ACB: -0.25
CGC: -0.82
The chart of Martin ratio for ACB, currently valued at -0.58, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
ACB: -0.58
CGC: -1.18

The current ACB Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is higher than the CGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACB and CGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.26
-0.67
ACB
CGC

Dividends

ACB vs. CGC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACB nor CGC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ACB vs. CGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACB drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum CGC drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACB and CGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-99.80%-99.60%-99.40%-99.20%-99.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-99.69%
-99.79%
ACB
CGC

Volatility

ACB vs. CGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) is 17.75%, while Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) has a volatility of 33.41%. This indicates that ACB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.75%
33.41%
ACB
CGC

Financials

ACB vs. CGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aurora Cannabis Inc. and Canopy Growth Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab