PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ACB vs. CGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ACBCGC
YTD Return39.44%90.22%
1Y Return1.22%-27.46%
3Y Return (Ann)-58.05%-66.39%
5Y Return (Ann)-63.63%-54.25%
Sharpe Ratio0.07-0.11
Daily Std Dev128.81%200.83%
Max Drawdown-99.80%-99.51%
Current Drawdown-99.53%-98.29%

Fundamentals


ACBCGC
Market Cap$367.60M$942.07M
EPS-$57.71-$15.52
Revenue (TTM)$275.88M$362.24M
Gross Profit (TTM)$21.23M-$81.94M
EBITDA (TTM)-$33.33M-$245.70M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between ACB and CGC is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ACB vs. CGC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ACB achieves a 39.44% return, which is significantly lower than CGC's 90.22% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-100.00%-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-93.80%
-63.55%
ACB
CGC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Aurora Cannabis Inc.

Canopy Growth Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACB vs. CGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ACB, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ACB, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ACB, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ACB, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ACB, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.21
CGC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.11, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGC, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.48
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGC, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.36

ACB vs. CGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACB Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the CGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ACB and CGC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.40December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.07
-0.11
ACB
CGC

Dividends

ACB vs. CGC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACB nor CGC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ACB vs. CGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACB drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum CGC drawdown of -99.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACB and CGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-99.50%-99.00%-98.50%-98.00%-97.50%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-99.53%
-98.29%
ACB
CGC

Volatility

ACB vs. CGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) is 53.86%, while Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) has a volatility of 73.97%. This indicates that ACB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
53.86%
73.97%
ACB
CGC

Financials

ACB vs. CGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aurora Cannabis Inc. and Canopy Growth Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items