ACB vs. CGC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC).

Performance

ACB vs. CGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ACB vs. CGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACB Aurora Cannabis Inc.	-22.51%	-0.71%	-10.75%	-48.38%	-82.95%	-34.90%	-67.94%	-56.45%	-34.99%	343.60%
CGC Canopy Growth Corporation	-16.74%	-58.39%	-46.38%	-77.88%	-73.54%	-64.57%	16.83%	-21.51%	13.58%	246.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ACB : $187.45M CGC : $327.98M
EPS ACB : $0.72 CGC : -$1.21
PS Ratio ACB : 0.51 CGC : 0.87
PB Ratio ACB : 0.35 CGC : 0.43
Total Revenue (TTM) ACB : $361.13M CGC : $294.24M
Gross Profit (TTM) ACB : $226.51M CGC : $71.95M
EBITDA (TTM) ACB : $76.03M CGC : -$225.88M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACB achieves a -22.51% return, which is significantly lower than CGC's -16.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ACB has outperformed CGC with an annualized return of -23.74%, while CGC has yielded a comparatively lower -26.31% annualized return.

ACB

• 1D: 6.17%
• 1M: -14.84%
• YTD: -22.51%
• 6M: -45.13%
• 1Y: -25.51%
• 3Y*: -22.31%
• 5Y*: -48.63%
• 10Y*: -23.74%

CGC

• 1D: 10.80%
• 1M: -15.25%
• YTD: -16.74%
• 6M: -34.99%
• 1Y: 4.31%
• 3Y*: -62.15%
• 5Y*: -68.79%
• 10Y*: -26.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ACB vs. CGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACB

ACB Risk / Return Rank: 26
ACB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
ACB Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
ACB Omega Ratio Rank: 28
ACB Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ACB Martin Ratio Rank: 24

CGC

CGC Risk / Return Rank: 47
CGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
CGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CGC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CGC Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACB vs. CGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACB	CGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.37	0.04	-0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.12	1.04	-1.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.12	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	-0.07	-0.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.01	-0.11	-0.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACB vs. CGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACB Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the CGC Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACB and CGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACB	CGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.37	0.04	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.54	-0.56	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.24	-0.26	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.26	-0.26	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between ACB and CGC is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ACB vs. CGC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACB nor CGC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ACB vs. CGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACB drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum CGC drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACB and CGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACB	CGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.80%	-99.85%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.56%	-55.61%	+5.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.17%	-99.74%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.80%	-99.85%	+0.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.77%	-99.83%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.19%	-61.53%	-8.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.99%	33.86%	-7.87%

Volatility

ACB vs. CGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) is 14.54%, while Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) has a volatility of 17.62%. This indicates that ACB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACB	CGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.54%	17.62%	-3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.42%	68.50%	-26.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.90%	117.39%	-47.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.13%	123.85%	-33.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	97.95%	102.96%	-5.01%

Financials

ACB vs. CGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aurora Cannabis Inc. and Canopy Growth Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ACB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.62M and revenue of 94.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

CGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canopy Growth Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.47M and revenue of 90.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.8%.

ACB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported an operating income of 4.81M and revenue of 94.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.

CGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canopy Growth Corporation reported an operating income of -26.35M and revenue of 90.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -29.2%.

ACB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported a net income of 1.82M and revenue of 94.19M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.

CGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canopy Growth Corporation reported a net income of -62.63M and revenue of 90.39M, resulting in a net margin of -69.3%.