PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACA vs. TTEK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACA vs. TTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACA achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly higher than TTEK's -16.76% return.


ACA

1D
0.77%
1M
0.50%
YTD
16.54%
6M
15.77%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*

TTEK

1D
2.47%
1M
-11.99%
YTD
-16.76%
6M
-19.63%
1Y
-20.12%
3Y*
-2.52%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACA vs. TTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ACA
Arcosa, Inc.
16.54%10.15%17.34%52.54%3.51%-3.73%23.87%61.89%31.86%
TTEK
Tetra Tech, Inc.
-16.76%-15.19%19.98%15.74%-13.96%47.46%35.34%67.76%-22.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ACA and TTEK is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018

0.43

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACA:

$6.09B

TTEK:

$7.30B

EPS

ACA:

$4.54

TTEK:

$2.20

PE Ratio

ACA:

27.29

TTEK:

12.66

PEG Ratio

ACA:

0.37

TTEK:

3.24

PS Ratio

ACA:

2.15

TTEK:

1.50

PB Ratio

ACA:

2.31

TTEK:

3.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACA:

$2.82B

TTEK:

$4.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACA:

$642.70M

TTEK:

$960.15M

EBITDA (TTM)

ACA:

$460.00M

TTEK:

$627.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACA vs. TTEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACA
ACA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ACA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ACA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TTEK
TTEK Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACA vs. TTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACATTEKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

-0.58

+1.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

-0.66

+2.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.91

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

-0.53

+2.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.65

-1.23

+6.88

ACA vs. TTEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACA Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the TTEK Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACA and TTEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACATTEKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

-0.58

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.12

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.34

+0.33

Drawdowns

ACA vs. TTEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACA drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, smaller than the maximum TTEK drawdown of -77.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACA and TTEK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACATTEKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.79%

-77.89%

+41.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.45%

-38.30%

+16.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.63%

-47.50%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.63%

-47.50%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.78%

-44.25%

+38.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.47%

-20.65%

+9.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.25%

16.39%

-9.14%

Volatility

ACA vs. TTEK - Volatility Comparison

Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) at 10.81%. This indicates that ACA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACATTEKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.42%

10.81%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.59%

27.17%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.85%

34.93%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.49%

32.06%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.62%

32.03%

+8.59%

Dividends

ACA vs. TTEK - Dividend Comparison

ACA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than TTEK's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACA
Arcosa, Inc.
0.16%0.19%0.21%0.24%0.37%0.38%0.36%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TTEK
Tetra Tech, Inc.
0.96%0.75%0.57%0.61%0.61%0.45%0.57%0.66%0.89%0.81%0.81%1.19%

Financials

ACA vs. TTEK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arcosa, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
571.70M
1.22B
(ACA) Total Revenue
(TTEK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACA vs. TTEK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arcosa, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

18.0%20.0%22.0%24.0%20222023202420252026
21.2%
17.6%
Portfolio components
ACA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arcosa, Inc. reported a gross profit of 120.90M and revenue of 571.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.

TTEK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tetra Tech, Inc. reported a gross profit of 214.09M and revenue of 1.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.6%.

ACA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arcosa, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.00M and revenue of 571.70M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.

TTEK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tetra Tech, Inc. reported an operating income of 131.52M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.

ACA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arcosa, Inc. reported a net income of 37.80M and revenue of 571.70M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.

TTEK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tetra Tech, Inc. reported a net income of 233.58M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACA and TTEK have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACA has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to TTEK (10.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACA dropped -36.79% vs TTEK's -77.89%.

ACA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACA and TTEK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer