PortfoliosLab logo
ACA vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ACA and NVDA is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ACA vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACA:

-0.00

NVDA:

0.36

Sortino Ratio

ACA:

0.22

NVDA:

1.08

Omega Ratio

ACA:

1.03

NVDA:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

ACA:

-0.03

NVDA:

0.83

Martin Ratio

ACA:

-0.06

NVDA:

2.04

Ulcer Index

ACA:

15.19%

NVDA:

15.08%

Daily Std Dev

ACA:

36.89%

NVDA:

58.89%

Max Drawdown

ACA:

-36.79%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

ACA:

-22.63%

NVDA:

-6.84%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACA:

$4.28B

NVDA:

$3.30T

EPS

ACA:

$1.59

NVDA:

$2.94

PE Ratio

ACA:

54.13

NVDA:

45.85

PEG Ratio

ACA:

6.72

NVDA:

1.93

PS Ratio

ACA:

1.64

NVDA:

25.32

PB Ratio

ACA:

1.71

NVDA:

41.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACA:

$2.60B

NVDA:

$104.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACA:

$529.00M

NVDA:

$77.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

ACA:

$408.60M

NVDA:

$68.38B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACA achieves a -10.77% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 3.66% return.


ACA

YTD

-10.77%

1M

7.61%

6M

-19.60%

1Y

-0.09%

3Y*

16.87%

5Y*

18.08%

10Y*

N/A

NVDA

YTD

3.66%

1M

27.67%

6M

2.86%

1Y

21.25%

3Y*

94.96%

5Y*

73.54%

10Y*

74.17%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Arcosa, Inc.

NVIDIA Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACA vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACA is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACA is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACA is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACA is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACA is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACA is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACA vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ACA Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACA and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ACA vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ACA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ACA
Arcosa, Inc.
0.23%0.21%0.24%0.37%0.38%0.36%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

ACA vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACA drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACA and NVDA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ACA vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) has a higher volatility of 10.92% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 10.06%. This indicates that ACA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ACA vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arcosa, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20212022202320242025
632.00M
39.33B
(ACA) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACA vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arcosa, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
19.8%
73.0%
(ACA) Gross Margin
(NVDA) Gross Margin
ACA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Arcosa, Inc. reported a gross profit of 125.40M and revenue of 632.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.72B and revenue of 39.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.

ACA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Arcosa, Inc. reported an operating income of 55.80M and revenue of 632.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 24.03B and revenue of 39.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 61.1%.

ACA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Arcosa, Inc. reported a net income of 23.60M and revenue of 632.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 22.09B and revenue of 39.33B, resulting in a net margin of 56.2%.