ACA vs. NVDA
ACA (Arcosa, Inc.) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. ACA operates in Infrastructure Operations (Industrials), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, ACA returned 15.91%/yr vs 65.68%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACA vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACA having a 16.77% return and NVDA slightly higher at 17.39%.
ACA
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- 16.77%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 41.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 11.41%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 19.38%
- 1Y
- 54.29%
- 3Y*
- 77.51%
- 5Y*
- 65.68%
- 10Y*
- 69.25%
ACA vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACA Arcosa, Inc. | 16.77% | 10.15% | 17.34% | 52.54% | 3.51% | -3.73% | 23.87% | 61.89% | 31.86% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 17.39% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -34.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACA and NVDA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018 | 0.31 |
The correlation between ACA and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ACA:
$6.10B
NVDA:
$5.33T
ACA:
$4.54
NVDA:
$6.53
ACA:
27.35
NVDA:
33.51
ACA:
0.37
NVDA:
0.18
ACA:
2.16
NVDA:
21.10
ACA:
2.32
NVDA:
27.28
ACA:
$2.82B
NVDA:
$253.49B
ACA:
$642.70M
NVDA:
$187.95B
ACA:
$460.00M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACA vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
ACA
NVDA
ACA vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACA | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.70 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.75 | 6.62 | -0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACA | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.60 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 1.28 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.63 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
ACA vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACA drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACA and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACA | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.79% | -89.72% | +52.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.45% | -20.21% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.63% | -36.88% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.63% | -66.34% | +29.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -7.14% | +1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.47% | -36.20% | +24.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.26% | 8.23% | -0.97% |
Volatility
ACA vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) is 9.31%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that ACA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACA | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.31% | 12.53% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.59% | 25.59% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.80% | 34.16% | +1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.48% | 51.67% | -17.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.61% | 49.80% | -9.19% |
Dividends
ACA vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
ACA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, more than NVDA's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACA Arcosa, Inc. | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.37% | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.13% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
ACA vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arcosa, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACA vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
ACA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arcosa, Inc. reported a gross profit of 120.90M and revenue of 571.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
ACA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arcosa, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.00M and revenue of 571.70M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
ACA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arcosa, Inc. reported a net income of 37.80M and revenue of 571.70M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACA and NVDA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to ACA (9.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACA dropped -36.79% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACA and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer