PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ACA vs. HUBB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ACAHUBB
YTD Return25.63%38.74%
1Y Return47.73%57.59%
3Y Return (Ann)23.68%31.89%
5Y Return (Ann)22.53%27.71%
Sharpe Ratio1.571.99
Sortino Ratio2.092.48
Omega Ratio1.291.35
Calmar Ratio2.783.65
Martin Ratio9.308.65
Ulcer Index5.35%6.74%
Daily Std Dev31.79%29.32%
Max Drawdown-36.79%-41.63%
Current Drawdown-2.50%-4.26%

Fundamentals


ACAHUBB
Market Cap$5.18B$24.26B
EPS$2.57$13.88
PE Ratio40.3032.57
PEG Ratio6.722.51
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.49B$5.64B
Gross Profit (TTM)$493.30M$1.92B
EBITDA (TTM)$305.30M$1.22B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between ACA and HUBB is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ACA vs. HUBB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ACA achieves a 25.63% return, which is significantly lower than HUBB's 38.74% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.63%
13.42%
ACA
HUBB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACA vs. HUBB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ACA, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.57
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ACA, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ACA, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ACA, currently valued at 2.78, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ACA, currently valued at 9.30, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.30
HUBB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HUBB, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.99
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HUBB, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.48
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HUBB, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HUBB, currently valued at 3.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.65
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HUBB, currently valued at 8.65, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.65

ACA vs. HUBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACA Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the HUBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACA and HUBB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.57
1.99
ACA
HUBB

Dividends

ACA vs. HUBB - Dividend Comparison

ACA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than HUBB's 1.08% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016
ACA
Arcosa, Inc.
0.19%0.24%0.37%0.38%0.36%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
1.08%1.39%1.82%1.92%2.37%2.32%3.17%2.12%2.22%

Drawdowns

ACA vs. HUBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACA drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, smaller than the maximum HUBB drawdown of -41.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACA and HUBB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.50%
-4.26%
ACA
HUBB

Volatility

ACA vs. HUBB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) is 7.97%, while Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) has a volatility of 10.04%. This indicates that ACA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.97%
10.04%
ACA
HUBB

Financials

ACA vs. HUBB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arcosa, Inc. and Hubbell Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items