ACA vs. HUBB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ACA (Arcosa, Inc.) and HUBB (Hubbell Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — ACA in Infrastructure Operations, HUBB in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Over the past 5 years, ACA returned 20.55%/yr vs 26.14%/yr for HUBB. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

ACA vs. HUBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACA achieves a 36.41% return, which is significantly higher than HUBB's 22.15% return.

ACA

• 1D: 6.67%
• 1M: 20.00%
• YTD: 36.41%
• 6M: 29.24%
• 1Y: 71.21%
• 3Y*: 26.78%
• 5Y*: 20.55%
• 10Y*: —

HUBB

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: 13.89%
• YTD: 22.15%
• 6M: 20.28%
• 1Y: 37.93%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 26.14%
• 10Y*: 20.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACA vs. HUBB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ACA Arcosa, Inc.	36.41%	10.15%	17.34%	52.54%	3.51%	-3.73%	23.87%	61.89%	-7.70%
HUBB Hubbell Incorporated	22.15%	7.43%	28.94%	42.40%	15.08%	35.60%	8.89%	52.88%	1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ACA and HUBB is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018	0.54

The correlation between ACA and HUBB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ACA : $7.13B HUBB : $28.76B
EPS ACA : $4.54 HUBB : $16.89
PE Ratio ACA : 31.95 HUBB : 31.93
PEG Ratio ACA : 0.43 HUBB : 1.34
PS Ratio ACA : 2.52 HUBB : 4.82
PB Ratio ACA : 2.71 HUBB : 7.61
Total Revenue (TTM) ACA : $2.82B HUBB : $6.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) ACA : $642.70M HUBB : $2.13B
EBITDA (TTM) ACA : $460.00M HUBB : $1.44B

Return for Risk

ACA vs. HUBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACA

ACA Risk / Return Rank: 87
ACA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ACA Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ACA Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ACA Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ACA Martin Ratio Rank: 88

HUBB

HUBB Risk / Return Rank: 76
HUBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
HUBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
HUBB Omega Ratio Rank: 72
HUBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
HUBB Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACA vs. HUBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACA	HUBB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.31	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	1.86	+0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.23	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	2.19	+1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.84	5.70	+4.14

ACA vs. HUBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACA Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the HUBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACA and HUBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACA vs. HUBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACA drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, smaller than the maximum HUBB drawdown of -41.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACA and HUBB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACA	HUBB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.79%	-41.63%	+4.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.45%	-17.36%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.63%	-32.65%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.63%	-32.65%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.02%	+3.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.45%	-7.43%	-4.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.26%	6.67%	+0.59%

Volatility

ACA vs. HUBB - Volatility Comparison

Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) at 9.23%. This indicates that ACA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACA	HUBB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.46%	9.23%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.90%	22.59%	+6.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.88%	29.15%	+7.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.65%	29.28%	+5.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.08%	28.86%	+13.22%

Dividends

ACA vs. HUBB - Dividend Comparison

ACA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than HUBB's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ACA Arcosa, Inc.	0.14%	0.19%	0.21%	0.24%	0.37%	0.38%	0.36%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HUBB Hubbell Incorporated	1.03%	1.21%	1.19%	1.39%	1.82%	1.92%	2.37%	2.32%	3.17%	2.12%	2.22%

Financials

ACA vs. HUBB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arcosa, Inc. and Hubbell Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ACA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arcosa, Inc. reported a gross profit of 120.90M and revenue of 571.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.

HUBB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a gross profit of 505.30M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

ACA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arcosa, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.00M and revenue of 571.70M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.

HUBB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported an operating income of 263.80M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

ACA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arcosa, Inc. reported a net income of 37.80M and revenue of 571.70M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.

HUBB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a net income of 181.80M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACA and HUBB in my portfolio?

ACA and HUBB have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACA or HUBB?

ACA has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to HUBB (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACA dropped -36.79% vs HUBB's -41.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.