ACA vs. CRC
ACA (Arcosa, Inc.) and CRC (California Resources Corporation) are both stocks. ACA operates in Infrastructure Operations (Industrials), while CRC operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, ACA returned 19.73%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for CRC. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACA vs. CRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACA achieves a 36.43% return, which is significantly higher than CRC's 19.89% return.
ACA
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 20.02%
- YTD
- 36.43%
- 6M
- 30.47%
- 1Y
- 67.23%
- 3Y*
- 26.79%
- 5Y*
- 19.73%
- 10Y*
- —
CRC
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -14.16%
- YTD
- 19.89%
- 6M
- 21.88%
- 1Y
- 17.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- —
ACA vs. CRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACA Arcosa, Inc. | 36.43% | 10.15% | 17.34% | 52.54% | 3.51% | -3.73% | 19.34% |
CRC California Resources Corporation | 19.89% | -10.78% | -2.57% | 28.85% | 3.69% | 81.82% | 18.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACA and CRC is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ACA and CRC has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
ACA:
$4.54
CRC:
$4.17
ACA:
31.95
CRC:
12.69
ACA:
2.52
CRC:
1.33
ACA:
$2.82B
CRC:
$3.48B
ACA:
$642.70M
CRC:
$1.30B
ACA:
$460.00M
CRC:
$1.34B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACA vs. CRC — Risk / Return Rank
ACA
CRC
ACA vs. CRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and California Resources Corporation (CRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACA | CRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.11 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 0.73 | +2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.29 | 1.47 | +7.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACA vs. CRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACA drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, smaller than the maximum CRC drawdown of -44.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACA and CRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACA | CRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.79% | -44.75% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.45% | -24.06% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.63% | -44.75% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.63% | -44.75% | +8.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -24.06% | +24.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.44% | -11.97% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.26% | 12.01% | -4.75% |
Volatility
ACA vs. CRC - Volatility Comparison
Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and California Resources Corporation (CRC) have volatilities of 10.33% and 10.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACA | CRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.33% | 10.69% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.88% | 27.43% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.81% | 35.82% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.65% | 40.47% | -5.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.07% | 44.67% | -2.60% |
Dividends
ACA vs. CRC - Dividend Comparison
ACA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than CRC's 3.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACA Arcosa, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.37% | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.45% |
CRC California Resources Corporation | 3.03% | 3.51% | 2.69% | 2.12% | 1.82% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ACA vs. CRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arcosa, Inc. and California Resources Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACA vs. CRC - Profitability Comparison
ACA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arcosa, Inc. reported a gross profit of 120.90M and revenue of 571.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
CRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, California Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 309.00M and revenue of 871.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.
ACA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arcosa, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.00M and revenue of 571.70M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
CRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, California Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 159.00M and revenue of 871.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.3%.
ACA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arcosa, Inc. reported a net income of 37.80M and revenue of 571.70M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
CRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, California Resources Corporation reported a net income of 12.00M and revenue of 871.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACA and CRC have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRC has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to ACA (10.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACA dropped -36.79% vs CRC's -44.75%.
ACA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACA and CRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer