PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACA vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ACA vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ACA vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ACA
Arcosa, Inc.
1.64%10.15%17.34%52.54%3.51%-3.73%23.87%61.89%31.86%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACA achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return.


ACA

1D
1.77%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
1.64%
6M
16.68%
1Y
38.49%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACA vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACA
ACA Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ACA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACA vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACA^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

0.92

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

1.41

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.41

+0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.06

6.61

-0.55

ACA vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACA Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACA and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACA^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.92

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.61

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.46

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between ACA and ^GSPC is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

ACA vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACA drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACA and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ACA^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.79%

-56.78%

+19.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.45%

-12.14%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.63%

-25.43%

-11.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.72%

-5.78%

-9.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.57%

-10.75%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

2.60%

+4.06%

Volatility

ACA vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that ACA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ACA^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.74%

5.37%

+3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.10%

9.55%

+16.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.33%

18.33%

+19.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.28%

16.90%

+17.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.65%

18.05%

+22.60%