PortfoliosLab logo
ABT vs. QCLN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ABT and QCLN is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ABT vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ABT:

1.46

QCLN:

-0.39

Sortino Ratio

ABT:

2.01

QCLN:

-0.34

Omega Ratio

ABT:

1.26

QCLN:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

ABT:

1.10

QCLN:

-0.20

Martin Ratio

ABT:

6.72

QCLN:

-0.89

Ulcer Index

ABT:

4.17%

QCLN:

15.93%

Daily Std Dev

ABT:

20.56%

QCLN:

36.47%

Max Drawdown

ABT:

-45.66%

QCLN:

-76.18%

Current Drawdown

ABT:

-4.54%

QCLN:

-65.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABT achieves a 18.96% return, which is significantly higher than QCLN's -13.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ABT has outperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 13.14%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.99% annualized return.


ABT

YTD

18.96%

1M

7.52%

6M

15.41%

1Y

29.77%

5Y*

8.70%

10Y*

13.14%

QCLN

YTD

-13.09%

1M

13.96%

6M

-13.40%

1Y

-12.48%

5Y*

3.37%

10Y*

4.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ABT vs. QCLN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ABT is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ABT is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ABT is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ABT is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ABT is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ABT is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QCLN is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QCLN is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QCLN is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QCLN is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QCLN is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QCLN is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ABT vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ABT Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABT and QCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ABT vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than QCLN's 1.07% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
1.71%1.95%1.85%1.71%1.28%1.32%1.47%1.55%1.86%2.71%2.14%1.95%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
1.07%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.25%0.72%0.78%

Drawdowns

ABT vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABT drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABT and QCLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ABT vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is 5.15%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 11.53%. This indicates that ABT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...