ABM vs. VGT
ABM (ABM Industries Incorporated) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, ABM returned 3.47%/yr vs 25.97%/yr for VGT. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABM achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 33.62% return. Over the past 10 years, ABM has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 3.47%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.97% annualized return.
ABM
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- YTD
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -7.66%
- 1Y
- -22.66%
- 3Y*
- -3.13%
- 5Y*
- -2.46%
- 10Y*
- 3.47%
VGT
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 19.95%
- YTD
- 33.62%
- 6M
- 32.71%
- 1Y
- 65.14%
- 3Y*
- 34.15%
- 5Y*
- 23.05%
- 10Y*
- 25.97%
ABM vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated | -5.65% | -15.53% | 16.35% | 3.04% | 10.73% | 9.81% | 2.14% | 20.39% | -13.05% | -6.13% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 33.62% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABM and VGT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ABM and VGT has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABM vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
ABM
VGT
ABM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | 3.19 | -4.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | 3.88 | -4.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.51 | -0.64 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 4.06 | -4.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 13.01 | -14.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 | 3.19 | -4.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.92 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 1.06 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.68 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
ABM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABM drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABM and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -54.63% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | -16.40% | -11.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.37% | -27.23% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.37% | -35.07% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.00% | -35.07% | -16.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.41% | 0.00% | -30.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -7.95% | -6.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.29% | 5.12% | +11.17% |
Volatility
ABM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 5.98%. This indicates that ABM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 5.98% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.38% | 15.98% | +5.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.30% | 20.52% | +7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.83% | 25.17% | +5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.81% | 24.60% | +9.21% |
Dividends
ABM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
ABM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than VGT's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated | 2.82% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.76% | 1.86% | 1.47% | 2.40% | 2.18% | 1.80% | 1.62% | 1.69% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.30% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABM and VGT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABM has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to VGT (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABM dropped -59.64% vs VGT's -54.63%.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABM and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer