PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABG vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABG vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABG achieves a -5.62% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 13.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ABG has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 14.33%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.35% annualized return.


ABG

1D
-1.52%
1M
5.53%
6M
-7.41%
YTD
-5.62%
1Y
-4.23%
3Y*
-0.30%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
14.33%
ALL TIME*
11.94%

VOO

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.46%
6M
12.84%
YTD
13.52%
1Y
24.01%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
15.35%
ALL TIME*
14.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$73.04M$61.26M$54.37M
$4.29B$3.83B$5.49B

ABG vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABG
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
-5.62%-4.32%8.03%25.51%3.77%18.52%30.37%67.70%4.16%3.73%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
13.52%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ABG and VOO is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between ABG and VOO has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABG vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABG
ABG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
ABG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ABG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABG vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABGVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.34

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

2.71

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.26

11.57

-11.84

ABG vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABG Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABG and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABG vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABG drawdown since its inception was -92.76%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABG and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABGVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.76%

-33.99%

-58.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.94%

-8.90%

-23.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.37%

-18.69%

-23.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.37%

-24.52%

-17.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.68%

-33.99%

-31.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.24%

-0.19%

-28.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.32%

-3.67%

-22.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.11%

2.08%

+14.03%

Volatility

ABG vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) has a higher volatility of 13.90% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.07%. This indicates that ABG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABGVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.90%

4.07%

+9.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.02%

10.27%

+14.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.88%

12.81%

+20.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.04%

16.96%

+23.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.45%

18.03%

+23.42%

Dividends

ABG vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ABG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABG
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABG and VOO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABG has higher volatility (13.90%) compared to VOO (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABG dropped -92.76% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABG and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer