PortfoliosLab logo
ABF.L vs. GIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ABF.L and GIS is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ABF.L vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Associated British Foods plc (ABF.L) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%2,000.00%2,200.00%2,400.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,541.59%
1,936.21%
ABF.L
GIS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ABF.L:

-1.05

GIS:

-0.88

Sortino Ratio

ABF.L:

-1.33

GIS:

-1.13

Omega Ratio

ABF.L:

0.82

GIS:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

ABF.L:

-0.62

GIS:

-0.54

Martin Ratio

ABF.L:

-1.31

GIS:

-1.43

Ulcer Index

ABF.L:

19.55%

GIS:

13.28%

Daily Std Dev

ABF.L:

24.16%

GIS:

21.74%

Max Drawdown

ABF.L:

-62.36%

GIS:

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

ABF.L:

-36.82%

GIS:

-35.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABF.L:

£14.51B

GIS:

$31.07B

EPS

ABF.L:

£1.77

GIS:

$4.55

PE Ratio

ABF.L:

11.41

GIS:

12.47

PEG Ratio

ABF.L:

1.23

GIS:

3.61

PS Ratio

ABF.L:

0.81

GIS:

1.53

PB Ratio

ABF.L:

1.31

GIS:

3.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABF.L:

£19.85B

GIS:

$19.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABF.L:

£1.73B

GIS:

$6.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABF.L:

£2.65B

GIS:

$3.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABF.L achieves a -3.50% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -12.85% return. Over the past 10 years, ABF.L has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of -2.46%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher 3.16% annualized return.


ABF.L

YTD

-3.50%

1M

4.87%

6M

-13.92%

1Y

-25.13%

5Y*

3.66%

10Y*

-2.46%

GIS

YTD

-12.85%

1M

-6.18%

6M

-15.78%

1Y

-19.06%

5Y*

1.45%

10Y*

3.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ABF.L vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABF.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ABF.L is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ABF.L is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ABF.L is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ABF.L is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ABF.L is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ABF.L is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIS is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIS is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIS is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIS is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIS is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIS is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ABF.L vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Associated British Foods plc (ABF.L) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ABF.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is comparable to the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABF.L and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.76
-0.87
ABF.L
GIS

Dividends

ABF.L vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

ABF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than GIS's 4.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ABF.L
Associated British Foods plc
3.20%3.08%1.14%2.77%1.00%0.00%1.78%2.20%1.45%1.34%1.05%1.08%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
4.41%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%

Drawdowns

ABF.L vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABF.L drawdown since its inception was -62.36%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABF.L and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-43.82%
-35.33%
ABF.L
GIS

Volatility

ABF.L vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Associated British Foods plc (ABF.L) has a higher volatility of 14.27% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.95%. This indicates that ABF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
14.27%
6.95%
ABF.L
GIS

Financials

ABF.L vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Associated British Foods plc and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
9.51B
4.84B
(ABF.L) Total Revenue
(GIS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ABF.L values in GBp, GIS values in USD

ABF.L vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Associated British Foods plc and General Mills, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
8.1%
33.9%
(ABF.L) Gross Margin
(GIS) Gross Margin
ABF.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Associated British Foods plc reported a gross profit of 765.00M and revenue of 9.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.1%.

GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

ABF.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Associated British Foods plc reported an operating income of 710.00M and revenue of 9.51B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 891.40M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

ABF.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Associated British Foods plc reported a net income of 520.00M and revenue of 9.51B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 625.60M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.