ABBV vs. WMT
ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) and WMT (Walmart Inc.) are both stocks. ABBV operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while WMT operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, ABBV returned 19.22%/yr vs 19.22%/yr for WMT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABBV vs. WMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABBV achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 5.60% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: ABBV at 19.22% and WMT at 19.22%.
ABBV
- 1D
- 6.25%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 28.17%
- 3Y*
- 23.52%
- 5Y*
- 19.47%
- 10Y*
- 19.22%
WMT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- 32.69%
- 5Y*
- 22.48%
- 10Y*
- 19.22%
ABBV vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 2.32% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 5.60% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | 23.32% | 30.16% | -3.43% | 46.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABBV and WMT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.23 |
The correlation between ABBV and WMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ABBV:
$408.04B
WMT:
$937.32B
ABBV:
$2.05
WMT:
$2.88
ABBV:
112.07
WMT:
40.70
ABBV:
6.49
WMT:
1.29
ABBV:
14.84
WMT:
9.94
ABBV:
$62.82B
WMT:
$725.31B
ABBV:
$46.15B
WMT:
$181.16B
ABBV:
$17.96B
WMT:
$44.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABBV vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank
ABBV
WMT
ABBV vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABBV | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.46 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | 4.42 | -0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABBV vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABBV drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBV and WMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABBV | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.09% | -77.14% | +32.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.32% | -15.75% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -21.93% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.92% | -25.74% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.09% | -25.74% | -19.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -12.68% | +9.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -14.63% | +3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.78% | 5.20% | +2.58% |
Volatility
ABBV vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and Walmart Inc. (WMT) have volatilities of 9.13% and 9.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABBV | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 9.54% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.02% | 18.48% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.21% | 23.80% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.11% | 21.69% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 21.75% | +4.08% |
Dividends
ABBV vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison
ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than WMT's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 2.93% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.82% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Financials
ABBV vs. WMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AbbVie Inc. and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ABBV vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison
ABBV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
WMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
ABBV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.
WMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
ABBV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
WMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABBV and WMT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMT has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to ABBV (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBV dropped -45.09% vs WMT's -77.14%.
ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABBV and WMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer