PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABBV vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABBV vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABBV achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 13.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ABBV has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 18.45%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.85% annualized return.


ABBV

1D
1.02%
1M
10.83%
YTD
1.08%
6M
2.16%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
23.16%
5Y*
19.52%
10Y*
18.45%

AAPL

1D
-1.25%
1M
7.00%
YTD
13.26%
6M
10.45%
1Y
53.80%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
20.16%
10Y*
29.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABBV vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
1.08%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%
AAPL
Apple Inc
13.26%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ABBV and AAPL is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.21

The correlation between ABBV and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.22 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABBV:

$403.11B

AAPL:

$4.54T

EPS

ABBV:

$2.05

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

ABBV:

110.71

AAPL:

37.32

PS Ratio

ABBV:

6.41

AAPL:

10.13

PB Ratio

ABBV:

14.66

AAPL:

42.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABBV:

$62.82B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABBV:

$46.15B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABBV:

$17.96B

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABBV vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABBV vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABBVAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

3.92

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

9.86

-6.59

ABBV vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABBV Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABBV and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABBVAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.42

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.74

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

1.04

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.44

+0.30

Drawdowns

ABBV vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABBV drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBV and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABBVAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.09%

-81.80%

+36.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.32%

-13.80%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

-33.36%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.92%

-33.36%

+11.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.09%

-38.52%

-6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-2.49%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-29.61%

+18.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.71%

5.47%

+2.24%

Volatility

ABBV vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.23%. This indicates that ABBV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABBVAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.15%

5.23%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.80%

15.92%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.23%

22.35%

+1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

27.45%

-4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.74%

28.89%

-3.15%

Dividends

ABBV vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
2.97%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%

Financials

ABBV vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AbbVie Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B140.00B20222023202420252026
15.00B
111.18B
(ABBV) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ABBV vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AbbVie Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
83.5%
49.3%
Portfolio components
ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ABBV and AAPL have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABBV has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to AAPL (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBV dropped -45.09% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABBV and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer