PortfoliosLab logo
AAVE-USD vs. ETH-USD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AAVE-USD and ETH-USD is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AAVE-USD vs. ETH-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aave (AAVE-USD) and Ethereum (ETH-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AAVE-USD:

1.52

ETH-USD:

-0.27

Sortino Ratio

AAVE-USD:

2.22

ETH-USD:

0.83

Omega Ratio

AAVE-USD:

1.21

ETH-USD:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

AAVE-USD:

0.99

ETH-USD:

0.04

Martin Ratio

AAVE-USD:

4.19

ETH-USD:

0.40

Ulcer Index

AAVE-USD:

34.52%

ETH-USD:

32.24%

Daily Std Dev

AAVE-USD:

89.42%

ETH-USD:

62.34%

Max Drawdown

AAVE-USD:

-92.18%

ETH-USD:

-93.96%

Current Drawdown

AAVE-USD:

-63.13%

ETH-USD:

-48.08%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AAVE-USD having a -24.47% return and ETH-USD slightly lower at -25.03%.


AAVE-USD

YTD

-24.47%

1M

64.10%

6M

36.66%

1Y

173.07%

3Y*

36.57%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ETH-USD

YTD

-25.03%

1M

54.89%

6M

-22.12%

1Y

-18.67%

3Y*

7.37%

5Y*

63.56%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Aave

Ethereum

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AAVE-USD vs. ETH-USD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAVE-USD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAVE-USD is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAVE-USD is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAVE-USD is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAVE-USD is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAVE-USD is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAVE-USD is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ETH-USD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETH-USD is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETH-USD is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETH-USD is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETH-USD is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETH-USD is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETH-USD is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AAVE-USD vs. ETH-USD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aave (AAVE-USD) and Ethereum (ETH-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AAVE-USD Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the ETH-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAVE-USD and ETH-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

AAVE-USD vs. ETH-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAVE-USD drawdown since its inception was -92.18%, roughly equal to the maximum ETH-USD drawdown of -93.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAVE-USD and ETH-USD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

AAVE-USD vs. ETH-USD - Volatility Comparison

Aave (AAVE-USD) and Ethereum (ETH-USD) have volatilities of 26.23% and 26.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...