AATC vs. UMC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC).

Performance

AATC vs. UMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AATC vs. UMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AATC Autoscope Technologies Corporation	-4.18%	-11.52%	43.25%	115.94%	-37.85%	-0.11%
UMC United Microelectronics Corporation	14.12%	28.65%	-19.01%	39.20%	-40.32%	27.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AATC : $29.81M UMC : $22.40B
EPS AATC : $0.25 UMC : $16.62
PE Ratio AATC : 21.38 UMC : 0.54
PS Ratio AATC : 3.31 UMC : 0.09
PB Ratio AATC : 2.91 UMC : 0.06
Total Revenue (TTM) AATC : $9.01M UMC : $238.14B
Gross Profit (TTM) AATC : $8.79M UMC : $68.91B
EBITDA (TTM) AATC : $2.11M UMC : $109.50B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AATC achieves a -4.18% return, which is significantly lower than UMC's 14.12% return.

AATC

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -6.30%
• YTD: -4.18%
• 6M: -15.42%
• 1Y: -26.62%
• 3Y*: 33.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMC

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -14.65%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 6M: 21.05%
• 1Y: 36.51%
• 3Y*: 7.26%
• 5Y*: 5.18%
• 10Y*: 21.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AATC vs. UMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AATC

AATC Risk / Return Rank: 6
AATC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
AATC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
AATC Omega Ratio Rank: 7
AATC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
AATC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

UMC

UMC Risk / Return Rank: 68
UMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
UMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
UMC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
UMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
UMC Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AATC vs. UMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AATC	UMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	0.90	-1.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.30	1.64	-2.95
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.20	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	1.07	-2.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.60	2.95	-4.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AATC vs. UMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AATC Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the UMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AATC and UMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AATC	UMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.99	0.90	-1.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.10	+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between AATC and UMC is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AATC vs. UMC - Dividend Comparison

AATC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.06%, more than UMC's 5.31% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AATC Autoscope Technologies Corporation	11.06%	28.40%	23.25%	7.38%	13.33%	3.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMC United Microelectronics Corporation	5.31%	6.06%	7.14%	6.93%	7.92%	2.44%	1.62%	3.51%	6.59%	2.41%	3.61%	3.15%

Drawdowns

AATC vs. UMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AATC drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, smaller than the maximum UMC drawdown of -72.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AATC and UMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	AATC	UMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.27%	-72.52%	+19.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.74%	-31.01%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-54.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-54.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.62%	-28.13%	-3.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.42%	-42.81%	+22.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.57%	11.29%	+5.28%

Volatility

AATC vs. UMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) is 6.87%, while United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that AATC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AATC	UMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.87%	9.62%	-2.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.96%	34.25%	-16.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.91%	40.98%	-14.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.20%	38.13%	-2.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.20%	38.39%	-3.19%

Financials

AATC vs. UMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Autoscope Technologies Corporation and United Microelectronics Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AATC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02M and revenue of 2.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.8%.

UMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a gross profit of 18.96B and revenue of 62.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.4%.

AATC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 563.00K and revenue of 2.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.

UMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported an operating income of 12.23B and revenue of 62.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.

AATC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 471.00K and revenue of 2.10M, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.

UMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a net income of 10.06B and revenue of 62.39B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.