PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AATC vs. UMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AATC and UMC is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

AATC vs. UMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
25.15%
-26.36%
AATC
UMC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AATC:

0.91

UMC:

-0.37

Sortino Ratio

AATC:

1.50

UMC:

-0.35

Omega Ratio

AATC:

1.19

UMC:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

AATC:

1.15

UMC:

-0.27

Martin Ratio

AATC:

2.29

UMC:

-0.75

Ulcer Index

AATC:

13.19%

UMC:

16.00%

Daily Std Dev

AATC:

33.09%

UMC:

32.43%

Max Drawdown

AATC:

-53.27%

UMC:

-85.96%

Current Drawdown

AATC:

-10.62%

UMC:

-37.32%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AATC:

$42.53M

UMC:

$16.74B

EPS

AATC:

$0.89

UMC:

$0.63

PE Ratio

AATC:

8.73

UMC:

10.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

AATC:

$10.29M

UMC:

$171.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AATC:

$9.83M

UMC:

$55.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

AATC:

$5.25M

UMC:

$79.39B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AATC achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than UMC's -0.15% return.


AATC

YTD

10.83%

1M

-10.62%

6M

25.15%

1Y

31.58%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

UMC

YTD

-0.15%

1M

10.96%

6M

-26.36%

1Y

-9.50%

5Y*

27.30%

10Y*

15.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AATC vs. UMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AATC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AATC is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AATC is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AATC is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AATC is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AATC is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AATC is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

UMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UMC is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UMC is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UMC is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UMC is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UMC is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UMC is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AATC vs. UMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AATC, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.91-0.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for AATC, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.50-0.35
The chart of Omega ratio for AATC, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.190.96
The chart of Calmar ratio for AATC, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.15-0.27
The chart of Martin ratio for AATC, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.29-0.75
AATC
UMC

The current AATC Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the UMC Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AATC and UMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.91
-0.37
AATC
UMC

Dividends

AATC vs. UMC - Dividend Comparison

AATC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.39%, more than UMC's 7.15% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AATC
Autoscope Technologies Corporation
22.39%23.25%7.38%13.33%3.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
7.15%7.13%6.93%7.92%2.44%1.61%3.51%6.59%3.47%5.03%4.73%3.66%

Drawdowns

AATC vs. UMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AATC drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, smaller than the maximum UMC drawdown of -85.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AATC and UMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-10.62%
-37.32%
AATC
UMC

Volatility

AATC vs. UMC - Volatility Comparison

Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) at 7.62%. This indicates that AATC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
11.08%
7.62%
AATC
UMC

Financials

AATC vs. UMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Autoscope Technologies Corporation and United Microelectronics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab