PortfoliosLab logo
AATC vs. UMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AATC and UMC is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AATC vs. UMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AATC:

1.84

UMC:

-0.15

Sortino Ratio

AATC:

2.57

UMC:

0.06

Omega Ratio

AATC:

1.32

UMC:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

AATC:

1.87

UMC:

-0.11

Martin Ratio

AATC:

7.82

UMC:

-0.26

Ulcer Index

AATC:

6.28%

UMC:

19.45%

Daily Std Dev

AATC:

28.28%

UMC:

36.17%

Max Drawdown

AATC:

-53.27%

UMC:

-85.96%

Current Drawdown

AATC:

-10.09%

UMC:

-25.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AATC:

$41.45M

UMC:

$19.59B

EPS

AATC:

$0.89

UMC:

$0.62

PE Ratio

AATC:

8.43

UMC:

12.58

PS Ratio

AATC:

3.27

UMC:

0.08

PB Ratio

AATC:

2.45

UMC:

1.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

AATC:

$10.49M

UMC:

$235.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AATC:

$9.99M

UMC:

$73.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

AATC:

$5.59M

UMC:

$104.15B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AATC achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly lower than UMC's 18.64% return.


AATC

YTD

11.49%

1M

-1.80%

6M

9.70%

1Y

51.57%

3Y*

30.75%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

UMC

YTD

18.64%

1M

11.27%

6M

15.10%

1Y

-5.25%

3Y*

2.12%

5Y*

31.98%

10Y*

18.82%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AATC vs. UMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AATC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AATC is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AATC is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AATC is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AATC is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AATC is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AATC is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

UMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UMC is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UMC is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UMC is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UMC is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UMC is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UMC is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AATC vs. UMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AATC Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the UMC Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AATC and UMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AATC vs. UMC - Dividend Comparison

AATC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.28%, more than UMC's 6.01% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AATC
Autoscope Technologies Corporation
21.28%23.25%7.38%13.33%3.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
6.01%7.13%6.93%7.92%2.44%1.61%3.51%6.59%3.47%5.03%4.73%3.66%

Drawdowns

AATC vs. UMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AATC drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, smaller than the maximum UMC drawdown of -85.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AATC and UMC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AATC vs. UMC - Volatility Comparison

Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) have volatilities of 7.95% and 7.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AATC vs. UMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Autoscope Technologies Corporation and United Microelectronics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
3.34M
57.86B
(AATC) Total Revenue
(UMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AATC vs. UMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Autoscope Technologies Corporation and United Microelectronics Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
94.7%
26.7%
(AATC) Gross Margin
(UMC) Gross Margin
AATC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.16M and revenue of 3.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.7%.

UMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.45B and revenue of 57.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.7%.

AATC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 1.49M and revenue of 3.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.8%.

UMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, United Microelectronics Corporation reported an operating income of 9.79B and revenue of 57.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.9%.

AATC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 762.00K and revenue of 3.34M, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.

UMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a net income of 7.78B and revenue of 57.86B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.