AATC vs. UMC
AATC (Autoscope Technologies Corporation) and UMC (United Microelectronics Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — AATC in Scientific & Technical Instruments, UMC in Semiconductors. Over the past 3 years, AATC returned 29.63%/yr vs 45.85%/yr for UMC. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AATC vs. UMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AATC achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than UMC's 172.52% return.
AATC
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- -6.77%
- 1Y
- -19.47%
- 3Y*
- 29.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UMC
- 1D
- -4.63%
- 1M
- 65.02%
- YTD
- 172.52%
- 6M
- 172.87%
- 1Y
- 190.23%
- 3Y*
- 45.85%
- 5Y*
- 23.80%
- 10Y*
- 33.53%
AATC vs. UMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AATC Autoscope Technologies Corporation | -0.65% | -11.52% | 43.25% | 115.94% | -37.85% | -0.11% |
UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 172.52% | 28.65% | -19.01% | 39.20% | -40.32% | 27.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between AATC and UMC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021 | 0.07 |
The correlation between AATC and UMC shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AATC:
$30.12M
UMC:
$10.78B
AATC:
$0.25
UMC:
$24.95
AATC:
22.30
UMC:
0.86
AATC:
3.37
UMC:
0.18
AATC:
3.08
UMC:
0.03
AATC:
$8.93M
UMC:
$240.73B
AATC:
$8.63M
UMC:
$71.28B
AATC:
$2.02M
UMC:
$119.50B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AATC vs. UMC — Risk / Return Rank
AATC
UMC
AATC vs. UMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AATC | UMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.61 | -0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 6.17 | -6.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 15.70 | -16.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AATC | UMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | 3.93 | -4.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.18 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
AATC vs. UMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AATC drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, smaller than the maximum UMC drawdown of -72.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AATC and UMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AATC | UMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.27% | -72.52% | +19.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.96% | -31.01% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.07% | -36.00% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -54.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.10% | -6.42% | -22.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.77% | -42.57% | +21.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.28% | 12.18% | +4.10% |
Volatility
AATC vs. UMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) is 10.72%, while United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) has a volatility of 20.21%. This indicates that AATC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AATC | UMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.72% | 20.21% | -9.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.68% | 42.83% | -22.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.50% | 48.67% | -20.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.13% | 39.54% | -4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.13% | 39.55% | -4.42% |
Dividends
AATC vs. UMC - Dividend Comparison
AATC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, more than UMC's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AATC Autoscope Technologies Corporation | 10.96% | 28.40% | 23.25% | 7.38% | 13.33% | 3.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 2.22% | 6.06% | 7.14% | 6.93% | 7.92% | 2.44% | 1.62% | 3.51% | 6.59% | 2.41% | 3.61% | 3.15% |
Financials
AATC vs. UMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Autoscope Technologies Corporation and United Microelectronics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AATC vs. UMC - Profitability Comparison
AATC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.00M and revenue of 2.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.6%.
UMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a gross profit of 17.82B and revenue of 61.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.2%.
AATC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 380.00K and revenue of 2.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.
UMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported an operating income of 11.22B and revenue of 61.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
AATC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 316.00K and revenue of 2.11M, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.
UMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a net income of 16.17B and revenue of 61.04B, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AATC and UMC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMC has higher volatility (20.21%) compared to AATC (10.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AATC dropped -53.27% vs UMC's -72.52%.
UMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AATC and UMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer