PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AATC vs. OBDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AATC vs. OBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) and Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AATC achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than OBDC's -8.81% return.


AATC

1D
-1.09%
1M
3.22%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
-6.77%
1Y
-19.47%
3Y*
29.63%
5Y*
10Y*

OBDC

1D
-2.32%
1M
-7.20%
YTD
-8.81%
6M
-12.95%
1Y
-14.95%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AATC vs. OBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AATC
Autoscope Technologies Corporation
-0.65%-11.52%43.25%115.94%-37.85%-0.11%
OBDC
Blue Owl Capital Corporation
-8.81%-7.87%14.69%43.51%-9.48%2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AATC and OBDC is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AATC:

$30.12M

OBDC:

$5.46B

EPS

AATC:

$0.25

OBDC:

$1.07

PE Ratio

AATC:

22.30

OBDC:

10.21

PEG Ratio

AATC:

0.29

OBDC:

15.34

PS Ratio

AATC:

3.37

OBDC:

4.14

PB Ratio

AATC:

3.08

OBDC:

0.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

AATC:

$8.93M

OBDC:

$1.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AATC:

$8.63M

OBDC:

$616.29M

EBITDA (TTM)

AATC:

$2.02M

OBDC:

$539.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AATC vs. OBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AATC
AATC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AATC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AATC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AATC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AATC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AATC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

OBDC
OBDC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
OBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
OBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AATC vs. OBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) and Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AATCOBDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.90

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

-0.63

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

-1.08

-0.12

AATC vs. OBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AATC Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is comparable to the OBDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AATC and OBDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AATCOBDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

-0.66

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.22

+0.11

Drawdowns

AATC vs. OBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AATC drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, roughly equal to the maximum OBDC drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AATC and OBDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AATCOBDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.27%

-56.07%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.96%

-23.90%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.07%

-23.90%

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.10%

-20.35%

-8.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.77%

-10.64%

-10.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.28%

13.85%

+2.43%

Volatility

AATC vs. OBDC - Volatility Comparison

Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) has a higher volatility of 10.72% compared to Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) at 6.18%. This indicates that AATC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AATCOBDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.72%

6.18%

+4.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.68%

18.45%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.50%

22.76%

+5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.13%

20.69%

+14.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.13%

27.07%

+8.06%

Dividends

AATC vs. OBDC - Dividend Comparison

AATC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, less than OBDC's 13.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AATC
Autoscope Technologies Corporation
10.96%28.40%23.25%7.38%13.33%3.82%0.00%0.00%
OBDC
Blue Owl Capital Corporation
13.70%12.55%11.38%10.77%11.17%8.76%12.32%3.80%

Financials

AATC vs. OBDC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Autoscope Technologies Corporation and Blue Owl Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
2.11M
342.53M
(AATC) Total Revenue
(OBDC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AATC vs. OBDC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Autoscope Technologies Corporation and Blue Owl Capital Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
94.6%
0
Portfolio components
AATC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.00M and revenue of 2.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.6%.

OBDC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 342.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AATC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 380.00K and revenue of 2.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.

OBDC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 342.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AATC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 316.00K and revenue of 2.11M, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.

OBDC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Capital Corporation reported a net income of 159.17M and revenue of 342.53M, resulting in a net margin of 46.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AATC and OBDC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AATC has higher volatility (10.72%) compared to OBDC (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AATC dropped -53.27% vs OBDC's -56.07%.

OBDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AATC and OBDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer