PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAT vs. ESS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAT vs. ESS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) and Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAT achieves a 25.33% return, which is significantly higher than ESS's 8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, AAT has underperformed ESS with an annualized return of -1.66%, while ESS has yielded a comparatively higher 6.14% annualized return.


AAT

1D
-0.09%
1M
13.31%
YTD
25.33%
6M
23.83%
1Y
24.39%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
-4.36%
10Y*
-1.66%

ESS

1D
0.08%
1M
4.96%
YTD
8.37%
6M
9.16%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
1.72%
10Y*
6.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAT vs. ESS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAT
American Assets Trust, Inc.
25.33%-22.96%23.32%-9.58%-26.36%34.03%-35.04%17.11%8.14%-8.89%
ESS
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
8.37%-4.98%18.36%21.97%-37.76%52.40%-18.09%25.92%4.83%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AAT and ESS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2011

0.59

The correlation between AAT and ESS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

AAT:

$0.29

ESS:

$9.59

PE Ratio

AAT:

79.94

ESS:

28.97

PEG Ratio

AAT:

3.68

ESS:

2.03

PS Ratio

AAT:

4.09

ESS:

7.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAT:

$438.19M

ESS:

$1.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAT:

$266.23M

ESS:

$1.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

AAT:

$231.92M

ESS:

$1.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAT vs. ESS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAT
AAT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ESS
ESS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ESS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ESS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESS Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAT vs. ESS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) and Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AATESSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

0.14

+0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

0.32

+1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.04

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

0.18

+1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.55

0.30

+3.25

AAT vs. ESS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the ESS Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAT and ESS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AATESSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.14

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.07

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

0.24

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.50

-0.35

Drawdowns

AAT vs. ESS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAT drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, roughly equal to the maximum ESS drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAT and ESS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AATESSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.85%

-62.67%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.97%

-16.49%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.02%

-20.77%

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.18%

-43.87%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.85%

-44.84%

-17.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.87%

-9.86%

-25.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.15%

-10.86%

-9.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

9.80%

-2.91%

Volatility

AAT vs. ESS - Volatility Comparison

American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) at 4.48%. This indicates that AAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AATESSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

4.48%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.47%

14.01%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.16%

20.76%

+3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.05%

23.70%

+4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.09%

25.80%

+5.29%

Dividends

AAT vs. ESS - Dividend Comparison

AAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than ESS's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAT
American Assets Trust, Inc.
5.83%7.18%5.10%5.86%4.83%3.09%3.46%2.48%2.71%2.75%2.34%2.47%
ESS
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
3.71%3.88%2.57%3.73%4.15%2.37%3.50%2.59%3.03%2.90%2.75%2.41%

Financials

AAT vs. ESS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Assets Trust, Inc. and Essex Property Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
110.59M
484.76M
(AAT) Total Revenue
(ESS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AAT vs. ESS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between American Assets Trust, Inc. and Essex Property Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
60.5%
70.9%
Portfolio components
AAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Assets Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 66.93M and revenue of 110.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.5%.

ESS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essex Property Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 343.50M and revenue of 484.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

AAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Assets Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 25.83M and revenue of 110.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.

ESS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essex Property Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 155.19M and revenue of 484.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.0%.

AAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Assets Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 5.13M and revenue of 110.59M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

ESS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essex Property Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -6.02M and revenue of 484.76M, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAT and ESS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAT has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to ESS (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAT dropped -61.85% vs ESS's -62.67%.

AAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAT and ESS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer