PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAP vs. WM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAP vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAP achieves a 46.86% return, which is significantly higher than WM's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, AAP has underperformed WM with an annualized return of -8.00%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.51% annualized return.


AAP

1D
-0.92%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
46.86%
6M
7.82%
1Y
12.08%
3Y*
-3.55%
5Y*
-19.67%
10Y*
-8.00%

WM

1D
2.86%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
1.65%
1Y
-7.86%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
15.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAP vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAP
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
46.86%-15.01%-21.10%-57.62%-36.50%54.68%-0.90%1.87%58.22%-40.93%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
-0.38%10.50%14.28%16.20%-4.49%43.82%5.46%30.45%5.32%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AAP and WM is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2001

0.29

The correlation between AAP and WM shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AAP:

$1.96

WM:

$6.91

PE Ratio

AAP:

29.09

WM:

31.55

PS Ratio

AAP:

0.43

WM:

3.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAP:

$6.02B

WM:

$25.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAP:

$2.62B

WM:

$5.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

AAP:

$592.00M

WM:

$6.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAP vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAP
AAP Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
WM Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAP vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.94

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

-0.46

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.61

-1.04

+1.64

AAP vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAP Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAP and WM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

-0.43

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

0.58

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

0.80

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.36

-0.19

Drawdowns

AAP vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAP drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAP and WM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.41%

-77.85%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.44%

-17.04%

-24.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.25%

-18.14%

-46.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.41%

-18.14%

-68.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.41%

-30.07%

-56.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.69%

-11.21%

-62.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.75%

-17.69%

-6.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.87%

7.92%

+11.95%

Volatility

AAP vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) has a higher volatility of 22.24% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 5.88%. This indicates that AAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.24%

5.88%

+16.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.68%

13.57%

+25.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.67%

18.59%

+35.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.00%

18.53%

+34.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.07%

19.49%

+25.58%

Dividends

AAP vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

AAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than WM's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAP
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
1.75%2.54%2.11%3.28%4.08%1.35%0.63%0.15%0.15%0.24%0.14%0.16%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.57%1.50%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%

Financials

AAP vs. WM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B202220232024202520260
6.23B
(AAP) Total Revenue
(WM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AAP and WM have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAP has higher volatility (22.24%) compared to WM (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAP dropped -86.41% vs WM's -77.85%.

AAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAP and WM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer