PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAOI vs. CVNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAOI vs. CVNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI) and Carvana Co. (CVNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAOI achieves a 428.03% return, which is significantly higher than CVNA's -24.59% return.


AAOI

1D
-9.04%
1M
6.41%
YTD
428.03%
6M
617.62%
1Y
998.27%
3Y*
332.83%
5Y*
85.24%
10Y*
32.59%

CVNA

1D
-2.97%
1M
-15.48%
YTD
-24.59%
6M
-19.43%
1Y
-6.43%
3Y*
172.78%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAOI vs. CVNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAOI
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
428.03%-5.43%90.79%922.22%-63.23%-39.60%-28.37%-23.01%-59.20%-23.43%
CVNA
Carvana Co.
-24.59%107.52%284.13%1,016.88%-97.96%-3.24%160.23%181.41%71.08%72.25%

Correlation

The correlation between AAOI and CVNA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.26

The correlation between AAOI and CVNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAOI:

$13.99B

CVNA:

$9.43B

EPS

AAOI:

-$0.65

CVNA:

$8.69

PS Ratio

AAOI:

24.18

CVNA:

0.47

PB Ratio

AAOI:

12.65

CVNA:

2.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAOI:

$507.00M

CVNA:

$22.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAOI:

$150.29M

CVNA:

$4.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

AAOI:

-$26.44M

CVNA:

-$116.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAOI vs. CVNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAOI
AAOI Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
AAOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAOI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AAOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAOI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CVNA
CVNA Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CVNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVNA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CVNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVNA Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAOI vs. CVNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI) and Carvana Co. (CVNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAOICVNADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

7.37

-0.11

+7.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.58

0.26

+4.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.03

+0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

21.18

-0.16

+21.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

59.65

-0.35

+60.01

AAOI vs. CVNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAOI Sharpe Ratio is 7.37, which is higher than the CVNA Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAOI and CVNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAOICVNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.37

-0.11

+7.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.02

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.45

-0.17

Drawdowns

AAOI vs. CVNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAOI drawdown since its inception was -98.49%, roughly equal to the maximum CVNA drawdown of -98.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAOI and CVNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAOICVNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.49%

-98.99%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.64%

-41.21%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.17%

-53.47%

-23.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.07%

-98.99%

+15.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.49%

-33.48%

+15.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.79%

-38.11%

-27.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.88%

18.24%

-1.36%

Volatility

AAOI vs. CVNA - Volatility Comparison

Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI) has a higher volatility of 42.89% compared to Carvana Co. (CVNA) at 15.52%. This indicates that AAOI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAOICVNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

42.89%

15.52%

+27.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

107.15%

43.03%

+64.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.01%

59.47%

+77.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

118.73%

111.18%

+7.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.94%

99.27%

-1.33%

Dividends

AAOI vs. CVNA - Dividend Comparison

Neither AAOI nor CVNA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AAOI vs. CVNA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. and Carvana Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
151.14M
6.43B
(AAOI) Total Revenue
(CVNA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AAOI vs. CVNA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. and Carvana Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
29.1%
19.8%
Portfolio components
AAOI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 43.92M and revenue of 151.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.1%.

CVNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carvana Co. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 6.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

AAOI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. reported an operating income of -12.99M and revenue of 151.14M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.6%.

CVNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carvana Co. reported an operating income of 581.00M and revenue of 6.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

AAOI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. reported a net income of -14.28M and revenue of 151.14M, resulting in a net margin of -9.5%.

CVNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carvana Co. reported a net income of 250.00M and revenue of 6.43B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAOI and CVNA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAOI has higher volatility (42.89%) compared to CVNA (15.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAOI dropped -98.49% vs CVNA's -98.99%.

AAOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.37 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAOI and CVNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer